taz.de
East vs. West Germany: Disabled People's Experiences and Activism
A "Mauerecho" podcast episode compares experiences of disabled people in East and West Germany, highlighting differences in societal treatment, self-perception, and activism; the discussion includes the lack of intersectionality in current discussions.
- What key differences in the treatment of disabled people existed between East and West Germany, and how did these impact individual self-perception and activism?
- Mauerecho" podcast episode 16 discusses the experiences of disabled individuals in East and West Germany. Martin Theben (West Berlin) and Steven Solbrig (East Germany), both living with disabilities, highlight stark differences in societal treatment and self-perception.
- How did the experiences of growing up with a disability in each German system shape the perspectives of Solbrig and Theben on sexuality and inclusion within the disability rights movement?
- Solbrig describes his East German childhood as one of concealment and normalization, lacking visibility of disabled people and role models. Theben, conversely, received encouragement to embrace his disability in West Berlin, attending a mainstream school. These contrasting experiences shaped their views on disability and activism.
- What systemic issues, specifically concerning ableism and intersectionality, continue to hinder progress in the inclusion of disabled people in Germany, and what role does active participation by disabled individuals play in achieving meaningful change?
- The podcast reveals ongoing challenges, including the lack of intersectionality in discussions about disability and sexuality. While progress has been made in the disability rights movement, systemic ableism persists, affecting legislation and societal attitudes. Active engagement from disabled individuals remains crucial for change.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced framing by giving voice to both a West German and an East German perspective on disability experiences. However, the focus on personal narratives might unintentionally overshadow broader systemic issues and policy differences between the two Germanys.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the experiences of two individuals, Martin Theben and Steven Solbrig. While their experiences offer valuable insight, the analysis might benefit from including additional perspectives from a wider range of individuals with disabilities in both East and West Germany to provide a more comprehensive picture. The lack of statistical data or broader societal trends regarding disability experiences in both Germanys could be considered an omission.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it could benefit from exploring the complexities and nuances of the experiences with disability in East and West Germany more explicitly, going beyond the comparison of two individual experiences.
Gender Bias
The article mentions Solbrig identifying as non-binary, demonstrating awareness of gender identity. However, a deeper exploration of how gender intersects with disability in both the East and West German contexts would enrich the analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The podcast discusses the experiences of people with disabilities in East and West Germany, highlighting inequalities in access to education, employment, and social participation. The discussion of ableism and the need for intersectional approaches to disability rights directly addresses SDG 10, which aims to reduce inequality within and among countries. The accounts of discrimination and marginalization faced by individuals with disabilities underscore the continued need for efforts to achieve equal opportunities and social inclusion.