elpais.com
Edmond de Rothschild AM Warns of US Market Risks, Plans Investment Shift
Benjamin Melman of Edmond de Rothschild AM identifies the main global market risk as stemming from uncertainty surrounding President Trump's policies and their potential inflationary impact on the US economy, prompting a shift toward European and Chinese assets.
- What are the main risks and opportunities in the global market in 2025, according to Edmond de Rothschild AM?
- Benjamin Melman, Edmond de Rothschild AM's investment head, notes a surprising market optimism favoring US assets over Europe. He points to the potential risks of this consensus, warning that positive aspects of Trump's policies are already priced in, while negative consequences (tariffs, immigration policies) are not. The firm currently overweights US equities but recognizes this is a fragile strategy.
- What are the long-term implications of the current market optimism toward the US, considering potential economic and political shifts?
- Edmond de Rothschild AM plans to shift its investment strategy in response to upcoming policy changes. They intend to increase exposure to European and Chinese assets, anticipating potential market corrections due to unpriced risks in the US. The firm's analysis emphasizes the importance of monitoring inflation and its impact on the US debt market.
- How does the firm's analysis of President Trump's potential policies impact its investment strategy, and what specific adjustments are planned?
- Melman highlights the significant market risk stemming from the uncertainty surrounding Trump's policy implementation. He links this to the potential for increased inflation in the US, emphasizing that many positive aspects of Trump's agenda are already factored into stock prices, but the negative ones are not. This creates a precarious situation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing centers around the uncertainty surrounding Trump's policies and their potential impact on the US market. This sets a negative tone and emphasizes risk, potentially influencing readers to view the US market more cautiously than they might otherwise. The optimistic outlook for Spain is presented more briefly and less emphatically.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but phrases like "Trump is like God" and descriptions of market optimism as "surprising" or potential inflation as "dramatic" introduce subjective elements. The repeated emphasis on risk and uncertainty contributes to an overall negative tone.
Bias by Omission
The interview focuses heavily on the US and European markets, with only brief mentions of China and Spain. There is no discussion of other global markets or significant geopolitical events that could impact investment strategies. This omission limits the scope of the analysis and may leave out important factors influencing investment decisions.
False Dichotomy
The interview presents a somewhat simplistic view of the US market, largely framing it as either highly attractive due to Trump's policies or risky due to potential negative consequences. Nuances and alternative scenarios are largely absent.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Spain's improved competitiveness, outperforming Germany. This positive economic development can contribute to reduced inequality within the Spanish economy by creating more opportunities and potentially higher wages.