theglobeandmail.com
Eight Countries Where Life Got Better in 2024
In 2024, Indonesia achieved record-low poverty and inequality rates, while Poland significantly improved its rule of law after a change in government; other countries including Thailand, Brazil, Bangladesh, Moldova, Botswana, and France also saw positive developments in various areas.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the improvements seen in these countries, and what challenges might they face in sustaining this progress?
- Looking ahead, these positive developments may inspire similar changes in other nations. Indonesia's model of economic growth coupled with social safety nets could be adopted elsewhere. Poland's success suggests that the fight against authoritarianism can yield positive results, even in seemingly intractable situations.
- How did the changes in government in Poland and the ouster of Sheikh Hasina in Bangladesh impact the rule of law and democratic processes in these countries?
- These improvements reflect broader global trends of social and political change. Indonesia's success highlights the potential of combining economic growth with social programs to reduce poverty and inequality. Poland's experience demonstrates that a shift away from authoritarianism can lead to improvements in fundamental rights and democratic governance.
- What specific improvements in quality of life or governance did Indonesia and Poland experience in 2024, and what are the immediate implications of these changes?
- In 2024, several countries experienced significant improvements in various aspects of life. Indonesia saw its poverty rate fall to a record low of 9 percent, accompanied by a decrease in inequality. Poland, after a change in government, showed marked progress in the rule of law, with improvements in checks and balances and open government.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is overwhelmingly positive, focusing on success stories and celebrating improvements. While these are important, the lack of balance might leave readers with an overly optimistic view of global trends. The headline and introduction set a celebratory tone, which continues throughout the piece.
Language Bias
The language used is largely celebratory and positive, employing words like "triumph," "success," and "celebrations." While not inherently biased, the consistent use of positive language might overstate the significance of the reported improvements. More neutral terms could offer a more balanced perspective.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on positive developments in select countries, potentially omitting negative aspects or challenges within those same nations or other global events. While acknowledging the positive, a balanced perspective would include counterpoints or challenges faced.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of progress, contrasting positive changes in some countries with an implied global negativity. The reality is more nuanced, with varying degrees of progress and setbacks across the globe.
Gender Bias
The article mentions several male and female leaders, generally without gendered language or stereotypes. However, the absence of analysis on gender equality within the described societal improvements is a noteworthy omission.
Sustainable Development Goals
Indonesia's poverty rate fell to a record low of 9 percent, and inequality also decreased. This is due to economic growth, resource exports, and social assistance programs.