lexpress.fr
El Salvador Eliminates Presidential Term Limits, Allowing Bukele's Indefinite Re-election
El Salvador's legislature passed a constitutional amendment eliminating presidential term limits, enabling President Nayib Bukele's indefinite re-election, despite criticism from human rights organizations regarding his strong-arm tactics against gangs and political opponents.
- What are the immediate consequences of El Salvador's constitutional amendment allowing President Bukele's indefinite re-election?
- El Salvador's legislature passed a constitutional amendment enabling President Nayib Bukele to seek re-election indefinitely. The reform, approved swiftly by Bukele's party, also eliminates the presidential runoff and extends presidential terms from five to six years. Bukele's current term will conclude two years early, in 2027, allowing him immediate eligibility for another term.
- How has President Bukele's popularity, stemming from his anti-gang campaign, influenced the passage of this constitutional reform?
- This constitutional change follows Bukele's June 2024 re-election with 85% of the vote, despite initial constitutional prohibitions. His popularity stems from a harsh crackdown on gangs, reducing violence but drawing criticism from human rights groups who cite extrajudicial killings and mass detentions. The swift passage of the amendment, with minimal opposition, underscores the consolidation of power under Bukele.
- What are the long-term implications of this constitutional change for democracy and human rights in El Salvador and what international responses might be expected?
- The amendment's passage reflects a significant shift towards authoritarianism in El Salvador. The elimination of term limits, coupled with the suppression of dissent and the erosion of democratic institutions, raises concerns about the future of democracy in the country. Bukele's partnership with the US on immigration further complicates the international implications of this power grab.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the constitutional reforms negatively, primarily highlighting the concerns of the opposition and human rights organizations. The headline (if any) likely emphasizes the negative aspects, such as the end of democracy or the concentration of power. The inclusion of quotes from opposition figures before those from the ruling party, and the use of words like 'cynical' and 'dictator' further supports this negative framing. The positive impacts on crime reduction are mentioned but downplayed within the context of human rights concerns. This prioritization of negative viewpoints shapes the reader's interpretation toward a condemnation of the reforms.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "impi-toyable lutte" (relentless fight), "cyniques" (cynical), and "dictateur" (dictator) to describe Bukele and his supporters. These terms carry negative connotations and shape reader perception. Neutral alternatives could include "severe measures," "critics," and "controversial reforms." The repeated use of quotes from opposition figures reinforces the negative framing. The description of Bukele's actions as "musclées" (muscular) could be considered loaded language, suggesting an aggressive approach that might not be fully representative.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the criticisms of the opposition and human rights organizations, but gives less detailed information on the government's perspective regarding the reforms and the reasons behind them. It also omits details about the specific legal arguments used to justify the changes to the constitution. The article mentions the president's popularity due to his tough stance on gangs, but doesn't present counter-arguments or alternative perspectives on the effectiveness or human rights implications of those policies. The positive impacts of the president's actions on reducing crime are mentioned, but the long-term social and economic effects are not discussed.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between Bukele's popularity and the opposition's accusations of dictatorship. It implies a false choice between supporting Bukele's policies and upholding democratic principles. The nuanced reality of the situation, including potential benefits and drawbacks of Bukele's actions, is not fully explored. The framing of the debate as a simple 'for' or 'against' Bukele overlooks the complexity of the political and social issues at play.
Sustainable Development Goals
The constitutional reform in El Salvador, enabling indefinite presidential reelection, undermines democratic principles and the rule of law. The suppression of opposition, arrests without warrants, and attacks on human rights defenders severely damage the country's institutions and justice system. This directly contradicts SDG 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice for all, and building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.