dw.com
ELN's Binational Operations in Venezuela Fuel Conflict and Hinder Redemocratization
Armed conflict in Colombia's Catatumbo region between the ELN and FARC dissidents, fueled by cocaine trafficking, has caused 52 deaths and over 52,800 displaced people by January 31, 2025; Venezuela's support for the ELN hinders peace in Colombia and Venezuela's redemocratization.
- How has the Venezuelan regime's support contributed to the ELN's transformation and expansion?
- This armed conflict stems from the ELN and FARC dissidents' fight for control of Catatumbo, a key cocaine production and trafficking hub connecting Colombia and Venezuela. Venezuela's support, including sanctuary and resources, has been crucial to the ELN's resurgence and transformation into a hybrid criminal organization.
- What are the long-term implications of the ELN's presence in Venezuela for a potential democratic transition?
- The ELN's deep entrenchment in Venezuela, acting as a de facto security force for Maduro's regime while engaging in extensive illicit activities, poses a significant obstacle to democratic transition in Venezuela. Dismantling this network requires joint Colombian-Venezuelan action to target the ELN's power sources in both countries.
- What are the immediate consequences of the Colombian ELN's operations in Venezuela, considering its impact on both countries?
- The Colombian ELN guerrilla group, now a binational criminal structure, operates in Venezuela with the Venezuelan regime's consent, fueling conflict in Colombia and hindering Venezuela's redemocratization. By January 31st, 2025, this conflict resulted in 52 homicides and over 52,800 displaced people in Norte de Santander, Colombia.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the situation primarily as a threat to Colombian peace and Venezuelan democratization, emphasizing the negative impacts of the ELN's activities and the Venezuelan government's complicity. While accurate, this framing could be broadened to include potential positive developments or efforts towards resolving the conflict, and to consider the human cost of the conflict more prominently.
Language Bias
The language used is generally objective, but terms such as "lucrative illicit business" and "radicalization of the Chavista regime" carry a certain charge. More neutral alternatives could be "profitable illegal activity" and "shift in the Chavista regime's policies." The frequent use of phrases like "according to accusations" in reference to the US Department of Justice could also be softened to avoid implicit bias, perhaps by phrasing as "according to reports from the US Department of Justice.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the ELN's activities and the Venezuelan government's support, but it could benefit from including perspectives from Venezuelan civil society organizations beyond Fundaredes, and a broader range of international actors involved in counter-narcotics efforts in the region. The article also omits discussion of the root causes of coca cultivation in the region, such as poverty and lack of economic opportunity, which could provide a more nuanced understanding of the problem.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy between the ELN and the Venezuelan government, portraying them as working together against a backdrop of a struggle for democratization. While this is a significant aspect of the situation, it overlooks other potential dynamics and power players, and the complexities of the internal political situation in Venezuela.
Gender Bias
The article does not exhibit overt gender bias. However, it would benefit from including female voices and perspectives from affected communities, particularly within civil society groups or those displaced by the conflict, to provide a more complete picture.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the negative impact of armed groups and drug trafficking on peace, justice, and strong institutions in both Colombia and Venezuela. The presence of these groups undermines state authority, fuels violence, and hinders the re-democratization process in Venezuela. The collaboration between Venezuelan officials and Colombian armed groups further weakens institutions and fosters impunity.