lemonde.fr
Enshittification": Big Tech's Monopoly on the Internet
The American Dialect Society's 2023 word of the year, "enshittification," describes Big Tech's monopolization of the internet, initially a free resource created by CERN scientists; Cory Doctorow analyzes this, proposing antitrust action and citizen mobilization as solutions.
- How did Big Tech companies achieve their monopolistic control of the internet, and what specific strategies did they use?
- Doctorow's analysis connects the current state of the internet to the initial intentions of its creators and the subsequent actions of Big Tech. He argues that the internet's inherent interoperability, intended to prevent monopolies, has been undermined by strategies like deliberately flawed software and the acquisition of competitors. This has resulted in a system where users are locked into services with high switching costs.
- What are the primary implications of the internet's monopolization by Big Tech companies, and how does this impact users?
- The American Dialect Society selected "enshittification," a neologism coined by Cory Doctorow, as its 2023 word of the year. This term describes how Big Tech companies have monopolized the internet, initially a freely shared resource developed by CERN scientists. Doctorow details how this monopolization has led to user captivity and high 'exit costs' for switching services.
- What long-term systemic changes are necessary to address the internet's monopolization and restore a more competitive environment?
- Doctorow's proposed solution involves antitrust action to force interoperability among competing services, reducing user captivity and promoting competition. He advocates for a citizen-led movement utilizing the internet, not a public monopoly. The success of this strategy depends on political will and overcoming the legal battles with established monopolies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Big Tech companies as villains actively working to undermine the internet's potential, using strong language like "confiscated" and "enshittification." The use of Doctorow's term as the word of the year reinforces this negative framing. The headline (if any) would likely amplify this biased perspective. The narrative prioritizes Doctorow's perspective and solutions, potentially downplaying alternative approaches.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "confiscated," "merdification," and "enshittification." These terms carry strong negative connotations and are not neutral descriptions of the situation. More neutral alternatives could include "acquired," "degraded," and "compromised." The repeated use of "Big Tech" casts them as a monolithic and malicious entity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Cory Doctorow's analysis and perspective, potentially omitting counterarguments or alternative viewpoints from Big Tech companies or those who support their practices. There is no mention of the benefits some users might experience from the current system, or attempts by Big Tech to address user concerns. This omission could lead to a biased portrayal of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as either 'abolishing Zuckerberg' or accepting the current system. It overlooks the possibility of reform or regulation as alternatives to complete dismantling of Big Tech companies. The options presented are overly simplistic.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the monopolistic practices of Big Tech companies, which contribute to economic inequality. Cory Doctorow's proposed solutions, such as antitrust laws and increased interoperability, aim to reduce this inequality by fostering competition and providing users with more choices. This aligns with SDG 10, which aims to reduce inequality within and among countries.