europe.chinadaily.com.cn
Escalating US-China Tech War: Implications and Strategies
The US's technological war against China is escalating, expanding beyond cutting-edge technologies to encompass applied research and development, prioritizing national security over market dynamics and resulting in deeper decoupling, disrupted supply chains, and hindered international collaboration.
- How has the US's focus on national security shaped its technological competition with China?
- Washington's approach, detailed in the National Standards Strategy for Critical and Emerging Technology, prioritizes applied technologies and industrial applications, viewing China's technological progress as a national security threat. This has led to the increasing overstretching of security concepts in sci-tech development and the subordination of market dynamics to national security considerations.
- What are the key characteristics of the US's escalating technological war against China, and what are its immediate implications?
- The US has escalated its technological competition with China, expanding beyond cutting-edge technologies to encompass applied research and development, prioritizing national security over market dynamics. This involves export controls, market blockades, and efforts to shape global tech norms.
- What long-term strategies should China adopt to navigate the US's tech war and foster a more stable global technological landscape?
- The US-China tech war's escalation will likely deepen decoupling, disrupt global supply chains, and hinder international scientific collaboration. China's response will involve boosting self-reliance, strengthening its tech ecosystem, and championing a fair, open, and sustainable international tech cooperation framework.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently portrays the US actions as aggressive and escalatory, while depicting China's response as defensive and necessary. Headlines and subheadings may emphasize this imbalance. The introduction sets a tone of US aggression from the outset, shaping the reader's interpretation before presenting alternative viewpoints.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language in describing US actions, such as "outright suppression," "full-fledged tech war," and "aggressive pursuit." While these words accurately reflect the intensity of the situation, they could be replaced by more neutral terms such as "restrictions," "intense competition," and "ambitious pursuit." The article uses phrasing like "China's rapid technological progress threatens US dominance", which highlights the threat perception. More neutral alternatives could focus on competition without emphasizing threats.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the US perspective of the tech war, potentially omitting Chinese perspectives and justifications for their actions. There is limited exploration of potential benefits or unintended consequences of the US approach. The lack of alternative viewpoints could limit the reader's ability to form a complete understanding of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a somewhat false dichotomy between US and Chinese technological dominance, overlooking potential for collaboration or multi-polar technological leadership. The article frames the competition as a zero-sum game, which may not fully reflect the complexities of international technological development.
Sustainable Development Goals
The US-China tech war exacerbates global inequality by hindering international collaboration, disrupting supply chains, and limiting access to technology for developing nations. This creates uneven technological advancement and economic opportunities, widening the gap between developed and developing countries.