kathimerini.gr
ESG Practices: A Global Shift Towards Value Creation
A new Morgan Stanley study reveals 88% of global companies view ESG practices as directly contributing to long-term value, up from 85% in 2024, highlighting a shift from risk management to value creation.
- What is the most significant finding of the Morgan Stanley study on ESG practices?
- The study shows a substantial increase in the percentage of global companies recognizing ESG's contribution to long-term value—88% in 2025 compared to 85% in 2024. This demonstrates a clear shift in perception, from viewing ESG as primarily risk mitigation to recognizing it as a key driver of value creation.
- What are the future implications of this trend, and what challenges remain, particularly for Greek businesses?
- The increasing ability to measure ROI on sustainability initiatives (83% of companies) and the positive outcomes exceeding expectations (65%) point towards a future where ESG integration is crucial for competitive advantage. However, Greek businesses may lag behind due to factors like a lack of education and long-term commitment, mirroring the situation in the Asia-Pacific region where ESG is still largely viewed as risk management.
- How do the findings of the Morgan Stanley study compare to other research, and what are the key drivers of this shift?
- The Morgan Stanley findings align with a 2024 CSE study in the Americas and Europe, which also linked profitability with sustainable development strategies. The shift is driven by increased investor and consumer pressure, regulatory changes, and the realization that sustainable practices enhance access to capital, reputation, and resilience, ultimately contributing to profitability.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a largely positive framing of ESG practices, emphasizing their contribution to long-term value and profitability. While it acknowledges challenges, particularly for Greek businesses, the overall tone suggests that embracing ESG is beneficial and financially advantageous. The use of statistics from Morgan Stanley and CSE research reinforces this positive perspective. However, the inclusion of the expert's opinion at the end further strengthens the positive framing, potentially overshadowing counterarguments or nuances.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, using statistics and research findings to support claims. However, phrases like "significant development" and "clear picture" subtly convey a positive bias. The description of businesses that haven't adopted ESG as 'behind' also shows a bias towards ESG adoption. The comparison between the situation in Greece and Asia is also somewhat biased, implicitly suggesting that Greek businesses are lagging.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the benefits of ESG adoption, but omits potential downsides or challenges that companies might face. There is little discussion about the potential costs or complexities involved in implementing ESG strategies, or about the difficulties of measuring ROI in all cases. While it briefly mentions 'costs of application' in the context of Greek businesses, it doesn't elaborate. The article might benefit from including diverse opinions and potential drawbacks. Although acknowledging space constraints, providing a broader range of viewpoints would improve the article's objectivity.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the ESG adoption process. It frames the choice as between embracing ESG and remaining 'behind' or 'inactive', potentially overlooking a spectrum of approaches and levels of commitment. This creates a false dichotomy that may pressure businesses to adopt ESG without fully understanding the implications. The emphasis on financial benefits could overshadow other motivations for ESG adoption.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the increasing adoption of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) practices by companies globally, demonstrating a shift towards sustainable business models. This directly relates to SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) by showcasing how businesses are integrating sustainability into their core strategies, leading to more responsible production and consumption patterns. The data presented shows a clear trend towards incorporating ESG factors into long-term value creation, indicating progress towards sustainable business practices. The article also mentions the impact of climate change on businesses, highlighting the need for sustainable practices to mitigate risks.