elpais.com
EU Bans TPO in Gel Nail Polish Due to Toxicity Concerns
The European Union has banned Trimethylbenzoyl Diphenylphosphine Oxide (TPO), a common ingredient in gel nail polish, starting September 1, 2025, due to potential endocrine and fertility risks found in animal testing.
- What is the immediate impact of the EU's ban on TPO in gel nail polish?
- The ban, effective September 1, 2025, requires manufacturers to reformulate gel polishes without TPO. This affects approximately 9 million recurring users and over 40 million annual treatments in Spain alone, where gel manicures constitute almost 60% of nail services. Consumers will see changes in product formulations and potentially increased costs.
- What are the long-term implications of this ban, and what alternatives exist for consumers and the nail industry?
- The ban necessitates the nail industry's shift towards TPO-free alternatives, such as products labeled "TPO free," "HEMA free," or containing BAPO (Bis-Acylphosphine Oxide). Long-term, it may increase product costs and push innovation in safer nail polish formulations. Consumers should prioritize products with CE marking, complete INCI labeling, and CPNP registration to ensure safety. Proper application techniques, including adequate breaks between manicures, remain crucial for nail health.
- What are the health concerns associated with TPO and gel manicures, and how widespread are these concerns among experts?
- TPO's suspected endocrine and fertility disrupting effects, revealed in animal studies, prompted the ban. Experts like podologist Jorge Escoto highlight concerns about weakened nails, dermatitis, infections (like paronychia), and even psoriasis-like conditions resulting from prolonged use and improper application techniques. The Ilustre Colegio Oficial de Podología de la Comunidad Valenciana (ICOPCV) echoes these concerns, emphasizing the need for proper nail care and professional application.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of the benefits and risks of gel manicures, acknowledging both the popularity and potential health concerns. The headline does not sensationalize the issue, stating the EU ban on a specific ingredient rather than a complete ban on gel manicures. The inclusion of expert opinions from podologists and a nail care instructor provides multiple perspectives.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. While terms like "mala mujer" are used in a quote, they are presented within the context of a song lyric and not used to describe anyone in the article itself. The article avoids overly emotional or sensational language when discussing the potential health risks.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including information on the prevalence of adverse reactions to gel manicures and the long-term effects of using alternative, safer ingredients. The focus is primarily on the immediate risks associated with TPO. However, given the length of the article, this omission is understandable.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the ban on a chemical used in gel nail polish due to potential health risks, including endocrine and fertility concerns. It also highlights the negative impacts of continuous use of semi-permanent nail polish, such as nail weakening, dermatitis, eczema, infections, and even more severe issues like psoriasiform nail dystrophy. This directly relates to SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. The ban on the toxic chemical and warnings about the negative effects of semi-permanent manicures contribute to protecting people's health.