lemonde.fr
EU Delays Anti-Deforestation Law Until 2026
The European Commission postponed the EU's anti-deforestation law's implementation from late 2025 to late 2026 due to the need for a fully operational monitoring system, facing criticism from countries like the US, Brazil, and Indonesia.
- What is the primary impact of this one-year delay on the EU's anti-deforestation law?
- The delay postpones the prohibition of placing on the EU market products linked to deforestation after December 2020, including palm oil, cocoa, coffee, soy, and wood. This allows more time for the development of the law's monitoring system but also further delays environmental protection measures.
- How did various stakeholders react to the initial 2024 delay and this recent postponement?
- Environmental groups previously criticized the 2024 delay, viewing it as detrimental to forest conservation. The recent postponement follows a free trade agreement with Indonesia, a country critical of the law, and reflects concerns from the US and several European nations about the law's implementation challenges and its impact on businesses and farmers.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of these delays for the effectiveness of the EU's anti-deforestation law?
- Continued delays risk undermining the law's intended impact by allowing further deforestation. The extended timeline might necessitate further revisions, potentially weakening its provisions. The credibility of the EU's commitment to environmental protection could also be compromised.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced account of the postponement of the anti-deforestation law, including perspectives from the European Commission, environmental organizations, and opposing countries. However, the inclusion of quotes from environmental organizations criticizing the delay as a "grave setback" and a "chainsaw blow" to forests might subtly frame the postponement negatively. The headline, if present, would also influence framing. The article's focus on the logistical challenges (the "computer system") in implementing the law could be interpreted as downplaying political opposition.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although terms like "grave delay" and "chainsaw blow" (in quotes from environmental groups) carry negative connotations. The description of opposition as a "levée de boucliers" (uproar) could also be seen as slightly loaded. More neutral alternatives could include describing the opposition as 'strong concerns' or 'significant criticism'.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including more details on the specific concerns of the US, Brazil, and Indonesia regarding the law. While mentioning their criticism, it lacks detailed explanations of their objections. Additionally, the article omits the specific proposals for revision mentioned by Italy and Austria, focusing more on their general push for a delay or revision. The absence of these details might limit the reader's ability to fully understand the complexities behind the postponement decision. Given the length constraints of a news piece, these are understandable omissions, but could potentially be addressed with links to further information.
Sustainable Development Goals
The one-year delay of the EU anti-deforestation law negatively impacts climate action by delaying the prohibition of products from deforested lands. This delay undermines efforts to curb deforestation, a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. The quote "grave retard" (serious delay) highlights the negative impact on timely implementation of climate-protecting measures.