
pt.euronews.com
EU Irregular Immigration Down 27.4% in 2024
The number of irregular citizens in the EU decreased by 27.4% in 2024, with land border denials (57%) exceeding air (39.8%) and sea (3.4%) denials. Germany, France, and Italy accounted for over half of all irregular citizens found within the EU; Ukraine, Albania, and Moldova comprised the largest groups denied entry.
- What are the primary reasons behind the high number of entry denials at specific land borders in the EU?
- The decrease in irregular citizens reflects increased border control measures across the EU. The high number of denials at land borders highlights the effectiveness of these measures in specific locations. The distribution of denials across different nationalities points to varied migration patterns and challenges.
- What were the most significant changes in irregular immigration to the EU in 2024, and what are their immediate implications?
- In 2024, the EU saw a 27.4% decrease in irregular citizens compared to the previous year. Germany, France, and Italy accounted for over half of the irregular citizens found within the EU. Land borders saw 57% of entry denials, primarily at Polish, Croatian, and Romanian borders.
- What are the potential long-term implications of these trends for EU border management policies and international cooperation?
- Future EU border management strategies should consider the specific patterns revealed: land border vulnerabilities, high denial rates for Ukrainian, Albanian, and Moldovan citizens, and the need for improved cooperation with neighboring countries. Addressing the root causes of irregular migration will be crucial to long-term success.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the decrease in irregular citizens as a positive development, emphasizing the numbers and statistics related to rejection and return. This framing might downplay the human element and potential complexities behind these figures.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the number of irregular citizens and rejected entries, but lacks context regarding the reasons behind irregular immigration. It also omits information on the support or aid provided to those who were rejected entry. Additionally, the long-term consequences of these rejections and the perspectives of the rejected individuals are not addressed. This omission limits a comprehensive understanding of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between voluntary and forced returns, without exploring the nuances or pressures that might influence an individual's choice to return voluntarily. It doesn't explore the circumstances that might lead someone to choose a forced return over a voluntary one.
Sustainable Development Goals
The decrease in irregular citizens and the increase in repatriations contribute to better border control and potentially reduce illegal activities, thus enhancing peace and security within the EU.