sueddeutsche.de
EU Migration Deal Exacerbates Hardship for Migrants in Tunisia
In Tunis, water scarcity forces a car wash employing West African migrants to operate with broken equipment; the EU-Tunisia migration agreement has intensified crackdowns, pushing migrants into poverty and leading to clashes with locals, resulting in a decrease in migration to Italy but increased hardship within Tunisia.
- What are the immediate impacts of water scarcity and the EU-Tunisia migration agreement on sub-Saharan African migrants in Tunisia?
- In Tunis, due to water scarcity, a car wash employing West African migrants operates with faulty equipment, highlighting the precarious conditions faced by migrants in the country. Ahmed Barry and Ali Moriba, two Guinean migrants, earn approximately €4.20 for a half-day's work if the broken equipment is not fixed. They share a two-room apartment with five others, illustrating the difficult circumstances.
- How have the actions of the Tunisian government, in conjunction with the EU agreement, affected the daily lives and living conditions of migrants?
- The hardships faced by Barry and Moriba reflect the broader challenges faced by tens of thousands of sub-Saharan African migrants in Tunisia, who have fled violence and poverty. A 2021 EU agreement to curb migration has led to stricter enforcement, forcing migrants into poorer areas, leading to increased antagonism and deadly clashes with locals. Many migrants are left unemployed and struggle to find housing, resorting to begging or selling goods to survive.
- What are the long-term implications of Tunisia's stricter migration policies, both for migrants within the country and for the broader dynamics of migration between Africa and Europe?
- The EU's funding for Tunisia's enhanced border control (€100 million) has demonstrably reduced irregular migration to Italy by almost 80 percent in 2023. However, this success comes at a human cost: increased suffering for migrants within Tunisia, illustrated by the closure of migrant camps and harsher living conditions. The IOM's repatriation program, facilitating the return of approximately 3,500 migrants by May, signals the human cost of restrictive migration policies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing tends to sympathize with the plight of the migrants. While objectively reporting their struggles, the descriptions of their living conditions and lack of opportunities are emotionally charged and elicit sympathy. The headline could be perceived as biased towards highlighting the hardship of migrants.
Language Bias
The article uses words like "hart" (hard), "schleppend" (sluggish), and "Zustrom" (influx) which may carry connotations. While not explicitly biased, these word choices contribute to the overall tone of sympathy for the migrants. More neutral terms could be used to maintain objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the struggles of migrants in Tunisia, but omits the perspectives of Tunisian citizens and their potential concerns about the influx of migrants. While acknowledging the hardships faced by migrants, the article could benefit from including perspectives on the challenges faced by the local population and the potential social and economic pressures caused by increased migration.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the situation by focusing primarily on the hardships faced by migrants and the actions taken by Tunisian authorities. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of the situation, such as the economic factors driving migration, the role of international organizations, or the long-term consequences of different policies.
Gender Bias
The article mentions women migrants resorting to begging or selling tissues, implying a gendered division of labor in survival strategies. While this may be a reflection of reality, the article could benefit from further exploration of gender-based challenges and inequalities faced by migrants in Tunisia.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the difficult living conditions of migrants in Tunisia, many of whom are driven by poverty and lack of opportunities in their home countries. They work in low-paying jobs with poor conditions, struggle to find housing, and face significant challenges in meeting basic needs. The situation is exacerbated by restrictive policies and the resulting lack of access to legal employment.