lexpress.fr
EU Proposes "28th Regime" to Boost Startup Competitiveness
The EU plans a new "28th company regime" to simplify business regulations, aiming to reduce relocation of startups outside the EU by addressing issues like insolvency, labor laws, and taxes, mirroring the US's successful National Securities Markets Improvement Act.
- What specific measures will the proposed 28th company regime implement to reduce the cost of business failure and improve the competitiveness of European startups compared to US counterparts?
- The European Union aims to create a 28th company regime to simplify regulations and reduce the cost of business failure for startups. This follows a pattern of approximately 30% of European unicorns relocating outside the EU between 2008 and 2021, highlighting significant internal barriers.
- Considering past failures of EU-wide company harmonization, what specific challenges are likely to hinder the success of the 28th regime, and how can its design avoid replicating past mistakes?
- The success of this new regime hinges on its scope and accessibility. While aiming for simplification, it might not fully harmonize regulations, potentially leading to a dual-speed system, especially in labor laws. The model mirrors the US National Securities Markets Improvement Act, which created a parallel pathway rather than replacing existing regulations.
- How do the internal barriers within the EU, equivalent to significant tariffs according to Mario Draghi, affect the relocation of European startups, and what specific areas will the new regime address to mitigate these effects?
- High internal barriers within the EU, estimated by Mario Draghi to equate to 45% tariffs on goods and 110% on services, hinder European innovation and competitiveness compared to the US market. A harmonized regime is intended to address this by simplifying rules in areas like insolvency, labor law, and taxation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the difficulties faced by European entrepreneurs and the need for a new "28th regime." The challenges are highlighted prominently, while the potential benefits of the proposed regime or alternative solutions are not given equal weight. The headline (if any) would likely reinforce this emphasis on problems. The repeated use of phrases like "trous dans la raquette" (holes in the racket) and "parcours du combattant" (obstacle course) contributes to the negative framing.
Language Bias
The article employs some loaded language, such as "trous dans la raquette" and "parcours du combattant," which carry negative connotations and emphasize the difficulties of operating within the EU market. The use of phrases like "chantier titanesque" (titanic undertaking) further reinforces this negative tone. More neutral alternatives could include phrases like "challenges" or "obstacles" instead of loaded terms that inherently present a negative perspective.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the challenges of a single European market and the proposed "28th regime" to address them. However, it omits discussion of potential benefits or successes of existing EU-wide initiatives aimed at business harmonization. The lack of counter-arguments to the prevalent narrative of fragmentation and difficulty in navigating the EU market could lead to a skewed perception of the EU's overall business environment. While acknowledging space constraints is important, providing a balanced perspective on existing successes and acknowledging alternative viewpoints would improve the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as a choice between a fully harmonized single market (which is presented as unrealistic) and the current fragmented system. It doesn't sufficiently explore alternative solutions or degrees of harmonization that could fall between these two extremes. This oversimplification limits the reader's understanding of the range of possible policy responses.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses initiatives to create a more unified business environment within the EU, aiming to reduce barriers for entrepreneurs and startups. This would foster economic growth and potentially create more decent work opportunities. The proposed "28th regime" aims to simplify rules, reduce the cost of failure, and streamline processes related to insolvency, labor law, and tax law. This directly supports SDG 8 by improving the business environment and increasing opportunities for economic growth and job creation.