it.euronews.com
EU to Eliminate 100ml Carry-on Liquid Restriction
The European Commission will allow EU airports to use advanced scanning technology, eliminating the 100ml liquid restriction for carry-on luggage; this change could take effect in the coming days, impacting passenger experience and airport security.
- How will the new technology address the limitations of existing security measures, and which EU countries are expected to adopt it first?
- The rule change addresses limitations of traditional X-ray machines in detecting liquid explosives. New 3D scanners and advanced detection systems already exist in some EU airports (Rome Fiumicino and Milan Malpensa) enabling thorough checks of larger containers. The European Civil Aviation Conference approved a technical screening solution in June 2025, paving the way for wider adoption.
- What is the European Commission's plan to change carry-on luggage restrictions for liquids, and what immediate impact will this have on air travel within the EU?
- The European Commission is eliminating the 100ml liquid rule for carry-on luggage, allowing EU airports to use advanced scanning technology for larger containers. This change, confirmed by Brussels to Euronews, may take effect in the coming days, significantly improving passenger experience. Currently, liquids over 100ml are banned unless they are medicines or similar.
- What are the potential challenges and long-term implications of implementing this new technology across all EU airports, considering the financial costs and logistical considerations?
- While the approval could come within days, adoption across all EU airports will depend on the high cost of new systems. Initially, seven Italian terminals are ready, with Germany, Ireland, Lithuania, Malta, Sweden, and the Netherlands potentially following suit. The full impact depends on the approval timeline and airport investment. For frequent flyers, the change will mean carrying normal-sized water bottles.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the change as overwhelmingly positive, highlighting the convenience for passengers. The headline (if there was one, implied from the opening sentence) would likely emphasize the removal of the 100ml restriction, creating a positive first impression. The focus is on the benefits for travelers, downplaying any potential challenges.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, but phrases like "tanto odiata regola" (much hated rule) and "una delle restrizioni più fastidiose" (one of the most annoying restrictions) reveal a subtly negative framing of the existing regulations. These could be replaced with more neutral terms like "current regulations" or "existing restrictions".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the positive aspects of the new regulations, without mentioning potential downsides such as increased costs for airports or potential security risks associated with the new technology. It also doesn't discuss the timeline for smaller airports to adopt the new technology, potentially leaving the impression that the change will be immediate and widespread.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic eitheor scenario: the old 100ml rule is inconvenient, the new technology solves the problem. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of implementing the new technology or potential alternative solutions.
Sustainable Development Goals
The new regulations will improve passenger experience at airports, reducing wait times and simplifying security checks. This contributes to more efficient and user-friendly transportation systems within cities and communities.