nos.nl
€130,000 Crowdfunding Campaign to Move Giant Miniature Churches in Delft
Ninety-year-old Chris van der Sman is crowdfunding €130,000 to move his two five-meter-tall miniature church replicas from his Nootdorp backyard to Delft, using a crane due to their size and delicacy.
- What are the logistical challenges involved in moving the miniature churches, and how does this affect the overall cost of relocation?
- The move highlights the significant cultural value of Van der Sman's work and the community's desire to preserve it. The €130,000 crowdfunding campaign reflects the community's investment in this unique local heritage. The planned locations, a care center and the TU Delft botanical garden, ensure public accessibility.
- What is the significance of the €130,000 cost to move Chris van der Sman's miniature churches, and what does this reveal about the community's values?
- Chris van der Sman (90) is moving his meticulously crafted miniature replicas of Delft's Old and New Churches. The relocation, costing €130,000 due to the size and delicacy of the structures, will move them a few kilometers from his Nootdorp backyard to more public locations in Delft. The high cost is attributed to the need for a crane and careful handling.
- How does the need for a crowdfunding campaign to move these churches highlight the challenges of preserving unique cultural artifacts, and what broader implications does this have for the future?
- This event points towards broader questions about the preservation of unique cultural artifacts and the role of crowdfunding in supporting such endeavors. The high cost of moving these delicate structures underscores challenges in maintaining and showcasing large-scale models. The success of the crowdfunding campaign could set a precedent for community-led preservation efforts.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the high cost of relocation, potentially influencing readers to view the project negatively. The headline focuses on the cost rather than the historical or artistic significance of the miniature churches. The opening paragraph immediately highlights the expense, setting a negative tone.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language like "lost" and "hear in Delft", which emphasizes the importance of the move in a way that might influence reader emotions. Neutral alternatives could be "relocated" or "displayed in Delft.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the cost and logistics of moving the miniature churches, potentially omitting other perspectives on the value of the project or alternative solutions. It does not explore the potential benefits to the community of having these structures on display, or the perspectives of residents near the proposed new locations. There is also no mention of the environmental impact of the move.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as either the churches being lost or moved at a significant cost. It doesn't explore alternative solutions, like potentially selling the churches to a museum or collector who could afford the move, or perhaps a less costly move.
Gender Bias
The article focuses on Mr. Van der Sman's achievement and doesn't mention the role of his wife beyond laying the symbolic first stone. This potentially underrepresents the collaborative nature of this project.
Sustainable Development Goals
Relocating the miniature churches ensures their preservation and public accessibility, contributing to the enrichment of Delft's cultural landscape and promoting sustainable urban development. The project also involves community engagement through crowdfunding, further strengthening community bonds and local initiatives.