sante.lefigaro.fr
European Life Expectancy Slowdown Linked to Lifestyle Factors
A new study in The Lancet Public Health reveals a slowdown in Europe's life expectancy increase since 2011, attributed to rising obesity, inactivity, and poor diet, with the COVID-19 pandemic worsening the situation; this deceleration varies across countries, with the UK experiencing significant challenges compared to nations with robust preventative health policies.
- How do the findings vary across different European countries, and what specific policies or factors explain these differences?
- The study, published in The Lancet Public Health, analyzed data from 20 European countries. While life expectancy increased by 0.23 years annually between 1990 and 2011, this slowed to 0.15 years annually between 2011 and 2019, and even decreased between 2019 and 2021 due to respiratory infections, notably COVID-19. Countries with robust preventative health policies, such as Norway and Sweden, fared better than those with higher rates of preventable diseases like the UK.
- What is the primary factor contributing to the recent slowdown in life expectancy growth across Europe, and what are the immediate consequences?
- A recent study reveals a slowdown in Europe's life expectancy increase, starting around 2011. This deceleration is attributed to rising rates of obesity, physical inactivity, and poor diet, which are negatively impacting life expectancy gains despite progress in cardiovascular disease and cancer treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated this trend, causing a decrease in life expectancy in many European countries.
- What are the long-term implications of this trend, and what measures should be implemented to mitigate the potential decrease in life expectancy for future generations?
- The findings highlight the critical need for improved public health policies focusing on preventative measures to combat obesity, inactivity, and poor diet. Future life expectancy trends in Europe depend heavily on the success of these interventions. A continued failure to address these risk factors could result in younger generations experiencing shorter lifespans than their predecessors.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the negative trend of slowing life expectancy increase, potentially causing alarm. The headline (if translated) would likely reflect this negative framing. While the article presents data, the focus on the slowdown, rather than the ongoing improvements in life expectancy for older populations, might skew reader perception towards pessimism. The use of phrases like "triste constat" (sad observation) further reinforces this negative framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms such as "triste constat" (sad observation) in the original French could be seen as emotionally charged. However, this is likely a reflection of the study's findings rather than an intentional attempt to manipulate reader emotion. Replacing it with a more neutral phrase like "sobering observation" or "concerning finding" would be suitable for an English translation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on European countries, omitting data from other regions. This limits the generalizability of the study's conclusions about global life expectancy trends. While acknowledging limitations due to scope is important, the lack of global perspective might lead readers to incorrectly assume the trend applies universally. The article also doesn't discuss potential socioeconomic factors influencing life expectancy variations between countries.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article reports a decline in life expectancy improvements in Europe since 2011, attributed to factors like obesity, physical inactivity, and poor diet. This directly impacts SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. The slowing increase and even decrease in life expectancy hinder progress towards this goal.