gr.euronews.com
European Public Priorities Shift: Security and Cost of Living Outweigh Climate Change
A Bruegel survey of 7,819 Europeans (2020-2024) shows that concerns about security and the cost of living have surpassed climate change as top priorities, despite nine in ten agreeing on the need for climate action; support for mitigation has decreased while support for adaptation increased, with significant variation across countries.
- What are the key findings of the Bruegel survey regarding changing public priorities concerning climate change in Europe, and what are the immediate implications for policymaking?
- A recent Bruegel think tank survey of 7,819 individuals across France, Germany, Italy, and Sweden reveals a shift in public priorities from 2020-2024. Concerns about security and cost of living have risen, while climate change has fallen in importance. While a small minority are climate change deniers, those considering it "not a big issue" increased from 3% to 9% in Germany and 4% to 11% in Poland.
- How does the Bruegel report explain the discrepancy between widespread agreement on the need for climate action and the declining support for mitigation efforts in some European countries?
- Economic stability/growth (60%) and security/defense (58%) topped citizen concerns in these five countries, with climate policy ranking third (39%), slightly ahead of immigration/refugee policy (38%). This aligns with the report's observation that climate policy is a prominent issue for far-right and increasingly center-right parties, extensively covered in the media. Support for climate action decreased across all five countries while support for adaptation increased, most significantly in Germany and Poland.
- What deeper societal, economic, or political factors contribute to varying levels of climate change concern and support for different policy approaches across the surveyed European nations?
- The survey reveals a complex interplay of factors influencing public opinion on climate change. While nine in ten Europeans agree on the need for action, economic anxieties and perceived personal benefits from the status quo seem to correlate with climate skepticism, particularly among wealthier individuals. This suggests a need for communication strategies addressing economic anxieties alongside the urgency of climate action. The widening gap between support for mitigation and adaptation efforts across different countries also highlights the need for tailored policy approaches.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the growing skepticism towards climate action, highlighting the increase in people who consider climate change 'not a big deal'. While presenting factual data, this framing may disproportionately emphasize negative trends and downplay the significant portion of the population that still supports climate action. The headline (if there was one) and the introduction would heavily influence this perception. The repeated mention of declining support for climate mitigation could inadvertently shape the reader's understanding of public opinion.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual, presenting statistical data without overt emotional language. However, phrases like 'growing skepticism' and 'declining support' carry a slightly negative connotation, subtly shaping the reader's interpretation of the trends. More neutral alternatives could include 'shifting public opinion' or 'changes in public attitudes'.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses primarily on public opinion regarding climate change, omitting potential discussion of governmental policies, industrial contributions to climate change, or scientific consensus on the issue. While the report mentions media coverage and the positions of certain political parties, a deeper exploration of these factors and their influence on public perception would provide a more complete picture. The omission of specific policy proposals to address climate change also limits the analysis's scope.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a somewhat false dichotomy by focusing on the contrast between public concern for economic security/cost of living versus climate change. It implies a trade-off between these issues, overlooking the potential for policies that address both simultaneously. For example, investments in renewable energy could create jobs and reduce reliance on fossil fuels, addressing both economic and environmental concerns.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights public concern and support for climate action in Europe, despite a decrease in support for mitigation efforts between 2020 and 2024. While concerns about cost of living and security are prioritized, climate policy remains a significant concern for a substantial portion of the population. The data reveals that a majority still supports climate action, indicating ongoing relevance and potential for future policy influence. The shift towards adaptation measures alongside mitigation is also noted, suggesting a nuanced understanding of climate challenges among citizens. The article also points out that climate change denial is a minority view.