ru.euronews.com
Europe's Economic Crisis Fuels Anti-Feminist Backlash
Economic hardship among young European men, particularly in housing and education, fuels anti-feminist discourse and contributes to increased support for far-right parties, contrasting with young women's greater support for progressive movements.
- What specific economic factors contribute to the growing political divide between young men and women in Europe?
- The economic struggles faced by young European men, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, are linked to a rise in support for far-right parties. 17.2% of young men (under 25) voted for far-right parties in the last European Parliament elections, almost double the percentage of young women (9.5%). This economic hardship contributes to a political divide, with young women more likely to support progressive parties.
- How are economic challenges in Europe impacting the political landscape, particularly concerning gender and the rise of far-right movements?
- A study by the European Policy Centre reveals that economic hardship among young men in Europe is fueling anti-feminist discourse. Young men lag behind young women in income, wealth, housing, and education; for instance, only 37% of 25-34 year-olds hold a degree, compared to 48% of women. This disparity is exacerbated by rising housing costs, outpacing inflation.
- Beyond addressing anti-feminist rhetoric, what broader economic policies are necessary to mitigate the observed political polarization and ensure progress on gender equality?
- Addressing anti-feminism requires acknowledging and resolving the economic anxieties of young men. Policies supporting affordable housing and job prospects for all are crucial, complementing, not replacing, existing efforts to improve women's representation, income, and safety. This holistic approach aims to foster greater confidence among youth in general.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the economic hardships of young men as a primary driver of anti-feminist sentiment and right-wing voting patterns. While the statistics on voting and gender pay gap are presented, the narrative strongly suggests a causal link between men's economic difficulties and their rejection of feminist ideals. This framing could potentially downplay other significant factors contributing to the rise of anti-feminist views and right-wing populism.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective, presenting statistical data to support its claims. However, the repeated emphasis on the economic struggles of young men and their link to anti-feminist views could be interpreted as subtly framing their plight as the central problem, potentially overshadowing the ongoing issues of gender inequality.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the economic struggles of young men and their correlation with anti-feminist sentiments and voting patterns. While it acknowledges the gender pay gap and higher education attainment among women, it omits discussion of other potential factors contributing to anti-feminist views among young men, such as societal norms, media influence, or personal experiences. Furthermore, the analysis lacks exploration into the economic challenges faced by women, especially those intersecting with other marginalized identities. The omission of these perspectives limits a complete understanding of the complexities of the issue.
False Dichotomy
The analysis presents a somewhat false dichotomy by primarily framing the issue as a conflict between the economic struggles of young men and the advancement of women's rights. It implies that addressing the economic concerns of young men is a necessary, and perhaps sufficient, condition for mitigating anti-feminist sentiments. This simplification overlooks the complex interplay of factors driving both economic inequality and anti-feminist attitudes.
Gender Bias
The analysis does acknowledge the gender pay gap and higher educational attainment of women. However, the primary focus remains on the economic challenges faced by young men and their link to anti-feminist sentiments. While it mentions the need to support women's rights alongside addressing men's economic concerns, the disproportionate attention to men's struggles could be perceived as minimizing the ongoing fight for gender equality.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the economic struggles faced by young men in Europe, which are partly attributed to the rise of anti-feminist discourse. The widening gender gap in education and employment, coupled with rising housing costs, disproportionately affects young men from disadvantaged backgrounds. This economic inequality fuels political polarization, with young men more likely to vote for far-right parties than young women. While women are making progress in some areas (higher education attainment and, in some countries, higher earnings in younger age groups), overall gender pay gaps persist. The economic hardship contributes to a sense of grievance among young men, which is exploited by far-right movements, hindering progress toward gender equality.