gr.euronews.com
EU's Competitiveness Pact: Common Debt Rejected
EU leaders adopt a competitiveness pact to boost the bloc's economy, but reject Mario Draghi's proposal for common debt.
Greek
United States
EconomyEuropean UnionEuInvestmentInternational TradeDebtCompetitiveness
European UnionEuropean Investment BankEuropean CouncilEuropean Commission
Mario DraghiDonald TrumpCharles MichelUrsula Von Der Leyen
- How does the agreement plan to fund its initiatives?
- The agreement focuses on leveraging existing tools like the EU's multiannual budget, the European Investment Bank, and a Capital Markets Union plan. It also explores "developing new instruments," without specifying details, to fund initiatives for improved competitiveness.
- What is the main goal of the "New European Competitiveness Pact"?
- The EU leaders approved a "New European Competitiveness Pact" aiming to revitalize the bloc's stagnant economy and bridge the widening gap with the US and China. The pact includes commitments to deepen the single market, unlock funds for SMEs and startups, reduce bureaucracy, and boost domestic high technology.
- What was Mario Draghi's key proposal that was not included in the pact?
- Mario Draghi, former Italian Prime Minister, proposed issuing new common debt (up to €800 billion annually) for the EU to remain competitive. However, this crucial recommendation was excluded from the final agreement due to opposition from countries like Germany and the Netherlands.
- What is the perspective of the EU leaders on the challenges of achieving economic solidarity?
- While acknowledging the difficulty of achieving economic solidarity within the EU, Charles Michel, President of the European Council, highlighted the possibility of agreement on contentious issues, citing the 2020 recovery fund as an example. Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the need for both public and private investments.
- What are the potential shortcomings or uncertainties of the "New European Competitiveness Pact"?
- The "New European Competitiveness Pact" lacks concrete details on how to address the innovation and productivity gap. Although exploring "new instruments" for funding, the absence of a common debt mechanism makes the plan's long-term effectiveness questionable, especially considering the scale of investments required.