
dw.com
EU's Digital Services Act Aims to Combat Image-Based Sexual Abuse
The EU's new Digital Services Act (DSA) seeks to combat image-based sexual abuse by holding online platforms accountable for illegal content, offering victims easier removal processes, and requiring stricter verification for pornographic platforms.
- What immediate impact will the EU's Digital Services Act have on victims of image-based sexual abuse?
- The DSA will provide victims with a streamlined, anonymous process to request the removal of non-consensual intimate images from online platforms. This contrasts with current challenges where platforms often lack efficient response mechanisms. The act also aims to prevent the initial spread of such content.
- What long-term strategies, beyond the DSA, are needed to effectively address image-based sexual abuse?
- Long-term solutions include implementing rapid takedown systems, similar to Australia's model, where government regulators quickly remove abusive content. Furthermore, comprehensive education programs targeting young people are crucial to prevent the creation and spread of such content, emphasizing the crime's impact on victims and the importance of consent.
- How significant is the issue of image-based sexual abuse, and what role do online platforms play in its spread?
- Image-based sexual abuse is rising, particularly affecting women in the EU, with 30% fearing the non-consensual publication of intimate images. Porn platforms, such as xHamster, see increased demand when such content is uploaded, demonstrating their role in perpetuating the abuse. Social media platforms like Telegram also contribute to the resharing and spread of these images.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of image-based sexual abuse, giving voice to victims and experts while also discussing legal efforts to combat the issue. The narrative flows logically, starting with a personal account, then broadening to discuss prevalence, legal ramifications, and potential solutions. There's no significant emphasis on one aspect over another that skews the overall understanding.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. While terms like "fretful," "numb," and "traumatize" convey emotion, they are used descriptively within the context of victims' experiences rather than to manipulate the reader's feelings. The article avoids sensationalist language.
Bias by Omission
While the article provides a comprehensive overview, certain aspects could be further explored. For instance, a deeper dive into the specific legal challenges of enforcing laws against image-based abuse across international borders would enhance the analysis. The article touches upon the role of algorithms in resharing content, but doesn't fully explore the technical aspects of how this occurs and how it might be addressed.
Gender Bias
The article focuses primarily on women as victims of image-based sexual abuse, which reflects the disproportionate impact on women. However, this focus is justified by the data presented and does not present gender as a monolithic category. The inclusion of diverse perspectives from women in different roles (victim, advocate, expert) is a strength. There is no evidence of gender stereotypes or language.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article directly addresses gender equality by highlighting the disproportionate impact of image-based sexual abuse on women. The rise in such abuse, the lack of awareness, and the subsequent trauma inflicted on victims are all gendered issues. The discussion of legal avenues for redress and the implementation of the DSA to tackle online abuse directly contributes to efforts to protect women and ensure their safety and equality online. The experiences shared by Ines Marinho and the advocacy work of Não Partilhes also underscore this connection.