cincodias.elpais.com
EU's MiCA Crypto License Creates Double Licensing Hurdle
The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation has created a double licensing requirement for crypto platforms offering e-money tokens and payment services, causing concern within the industry due to tight deadlines and complex procedures.
- How are industry stakeholders responding to this double licensing requirement, and what are their main concerns?
- Industry experts and platforms like Aefi and ATH21 criticize the double licensing as disproportionate and practically impossible to meet by the March 2, 2026 deadline. Concerns include the complexity of the application process, resource demands, and potential delays despite efforts to streamline applications.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this regulatory overlap, and how might it affect the European crypto market?
- The regulatory overlap could hinder innovation and growth within the European crypto market, particularly for smaller platforms. While aiming to enhance consumer protection, the current approach may create barriers to entry and disproportionately impact smaller players. The upcoming PSD3 directive might offer some solutions to this regulatory complexity.
- What is the core impact of the recent clarification by the European Banking Authority (EBA) regarding MiCA licenses and payment service licenses?
- The EBA clarified that crypto platforms facilitating payments using e-money tokens (stablecoins pegged to official currencies) require both a MiCA license and a payment institution or e-money institution license. This creates a double licensing requirement for some platforms, impacting operational costs and timelines.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of the situation, showcasing both the benefits of MiCA's implementation and the concerns raised by industry experts regarding the double licensing requirement. The concerns are given significant weight, including direct quotes from representatives of affected entities. However, the article also highlights the efforts made by regulators to streamline the process and the progress made by some companies in obtaining the necessary licenses. This avoids presenting a solely negative or overly positive perspective.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. While the concerns of industry experts are presented, the article avoids using inflammatory language or emotionally charged terms to describe the situation. The inclusion of direct quotes helps maintain objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including perspectives from smaller crypto firms or individuals who may be disproportionately affected by the double licensing requirements. While the concerns of larger players like Bitpanda and Kraken are covered, the experiences of smaller businesses might offer a different perspective on the feasibility and impact of the new regulations. The article also doesn't delve deeply into the specifics of PSD3 and its implications for the industry.
Sustainable Development Goals
The implementation of MiCA aims to create a more stable and transparent cryptocurrency market in Europe. This can indirectly contribute to reduced inequality by promoting financial inclusion and fair access to financial services, although the complexities and costs associated with obtaining licenses raise concerns. The article highlights that the new regulations may disproportionately affect smaller companies, potentially exacerbating existing inequalities.