dw.com
EU's Rising Influence in Southeast Asia
A recent survey by the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute shows over half of Southeast Asian opinion leaders believe the EU will "do the right thing" globally, a significant rise from 2024, driven by trade deals and revised environmental policies, although its soft power remains weak.
- How has the EU's approach to trade and environmental regulations influenced its image in Southeast Asia?
- The EU's improved standing is linked to several factors, including its revised approach to the Green Deal, easing trade tensions with ASEAN countries, and pursuing free trade agreements with Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia. This positive shift contrasts with a slight decline in those viewing the EU as their preferred major power partner.
- What challenges does the EU face in enhancing its soft power and long-term influence in the Southeast Asian region?
- Despite increased trust, the EU's soft power remains comparatively weak. Fewer than 10% of respondents would choose an EU country as their preferred place to live and work, highlighting a need for the EU to enhance its cultural and social influence in the region. The survey's timing, before recent US-China trade tensions, also adds complexity to the interpretation.
- What is the primary reason for the significant increase in Southeast Asian opinion leaders' trust in the European Union's global actions?
- A recent ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute survey reveals that over half of Southeast Asian opinion leaders believe the European Union will "do the right thing" globally. This marks a significant increase from 41.5% in 2024 to 51.9% in 2025, exceeding previous levels.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is largely positive towards the EU, highlighting its increasing popularity and influence in Southeast Asia. The headline and opening statements emphasize the high level of trust in the EU among opinion leaders. While the article mentions some criticisms and challenges, the overall tone and structure suggest a favorable view of the EU's role. The inclusion of quotes from EU representatives and those who view the EU positively reinforces this favorable framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but some phrases could be considered slightly loaded. For example, describing the EU as taking 'the right steps' implies a value judgment. Similarly, 'clearly good news' is an opinion, not a factual statement. More neutral phrasing, like 'steps taken' and 'positive results,' would improve objectivity. The repeated use of positive descriptors for the EU's actions subtly shapes the reader's perception.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the positive perception of the EU in Southeast Asia, potentially omitting critical perspectives or negative opinions. While acknowledging limitations of space, the lack of dissenting voices might limit the reader's understanding of the complexities of EU-ASEAN relations. For instance, the article could benefit from including viewpoints that express skepticism towards the EU's policies or actions. The article also does not delve into the specific details of the 'Green Deal' modifications and how they may still impact ASEAN nations.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the geopolitical landscape, mainly focusing on the EU, US, and China. While acknowledging the competition between the US and China, it doesn't fully explore other significant players or the nuances within the relationships between these powers and Southeast Asian nations. A more balanced approach would consider a wider range of perspectives and complexities.
Sustainable Development Goals
The survey shows increased trust in the EU's ability to uphold international law and maintain a rules-based global order. This directly contributes to SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.