lemonde.fr
Evictions of Disabled Students in Abidjan Amidst University Housing Crisis
Following the dissolution of a student union in October 2024, a campaign to remove students from over-occupied university housing in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, has disproportionately affected disabled students, leading to evictions despite a temporary ministerial intervention.
- What immediate actions are being taken to address the eviction of disabled students from university housing in Abidjan, and what are the short-term consequences for these students?
- In Abidjan, Ivory Coast, a campaign to remove students from university housing has disproportionately affected students with disabilities. A 32-year-old master's student, Helena Biaka, found her dorm room sealed shut. While she temporarily regained access, the situation highlights the vulnerability of disabled students during this eviction drive.",
- What are the underlying causes of the housing shortage in Ivorian universities, and how does the government's response to the Fesci's dissolution exacerbate existing inequalities for disabled students?
- The evictions stem from the October 2024 dissolution of the Fesci student union, which illegally controlled dorm assignments. The government aims to free up approximately 35% of illegally occupied beds to address a severe housing shortage affecting 94% of students. However, the blanket application of age limits (24 for undergraduates, 26 for master's, 30 for PhDs) disregards the unique challenges faced by disabled students.",
- What long-term strategies should be implemented to ensure inclusive access to university housing for disabled students in Ivory Coast, considering the ongoing challenges and potential conflicts between resource allocation and equal opportunity?
- The incident underscores the complex interplay between efforts to improve university housing management and the need for inclusive policies. While addressing illegal occupancy is crucial, the government's response risks exacerbating existing inequalities. Future solutions must prioritize the specific needs of disabled students to ensure equitable access to higher education, requiring tailored criteria and increased support.",
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story primarily from the perspective of the affected disabled students, highlighting their struggles and the perceived unfairness of the evictions. While it mentions the government's perspective, it emphasizes the negative impact on disabled students more prominently. The headline (if one existed) would likely influence the reader's initial understanding of the situation. The repeated use of phrases like "harassment" and "dangerous" creates a negative perception of the CROU's actions.
Language Bias
The article uses charged language such as "harcèlement nocturne" (night harassment), which is emotionally loaded. Other strong words used, such as "désemparée" (desperate), "dangereusement" (dangerously), and "illégale" (illegal), evoke strong negative reactions towards the CROU. More neutral language could have been used; for example, instead of "harcèlement nocturne", the phrase "nighttime visits" could have been used. The term "Cambodgiens" (Cambodians), a derogatory nickname, should also be replaced with a more neutral description of those occupying rooms illegally.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the eviction of students and the government's perspective, but it lacks details on the overall living conditions of students and the extent of illegal occupancy. It also omits information on the CROU's plans to accommodate disabled students long-term. The number of disabled students affected is mentioned (around 50 initially targeted), but there's no mention of the total number of students impacted by the evictions. The article briefly mentions the shortage of student housing but doesn't provide a detailed explanation of the underlying causes or potential solutions beyond the age restrictions.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between the need to address illegal occupancy and the rights of disabled students. It frames the situation as an eitheor choice, neglecting the possibility of finding solutions that accommodate both concerns. The government's position is presented as inflexible, overlooking the possibility of compromise.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the eviction of disabled students from university housing in Côte d'Ivoire due to strict age criteria, which disproportionately affects them and hinders their access to higher education. This directly impacts the SDG 4 (Quality Education) target of ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all.