repubblica.it
Evolution of Papal Conclave Smoke Signals
The Sistine Chapel's smoke signals—black for no election, white for a new Pope—have evolved since 1914, when white smoke was introduced, adding church bells and artificial intensifying smoke to eliminate ambiguities and confirm the election of a new Pope.
- What system is used to communicate the results of a Papal conclave, and how has it changed over time?
- The color of the smoke from the Sistine Chapel chimney signals the outcome of a Papal conclave: black smoke indicates no election, while white smoke signals the election of a new Pope. In 1914, the introduction of white smoke replaced the previous system where only black smoke was used, signifying a change in the process.
- What are the chemical compositions used to create black and white smoke, and why was a third color, yellow, used in the past?
- Historically, a yellow smoke was also used to test the chimney system. However, since 2005, this has been replaced by an electronic system, leaving only black and white smoke as signals. The specific chemical composition of each smoke differs, with white smoke including potassium chlorate, lactose, and rosin.
- How have ambiguities in smoke color interpretation led to speculation, and how has the current system addressed these issues to ensure clarity?
- The ambiguity of smoke color, affected by weather conditions, has occasionally led to confusion and conspiracy theories. To address this, the election of a new Pope is now confirmed by ringing church bells alongside the white smoke, using added artificial smoke to intensify the color and eliminate ambiguity.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the evolution of the smoke signals as a purely technical and logistical improvement. The headline and introduction emphasize the mechanics of the process over broader interpretations, potentially downplaying the historical and religious significance of the events.
Language Bias
The language is largely neutral and descriptive, focusing on factual information. However, phrases like "maligni" (malicious) when describing rumors about a 1958 election subtly introduce a biased tone. More neutral phrasing like "doubts were raised" could be used.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the historical and technical aspects of papal election smoke signals, omitting potential discussions on the political and religious implications of each election. While acknowledging limitations of scope, the lack of broader context might leave readers with an incomplete understanding of the significance of these events.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy between black and white smoke, but omits the historical existence of yellow smoke and its purpose. This simplification might overlook nuances in the evolution of the process.