mk.ru
Expert: EU Will Overcome Current Difficulties, Avoid Collapse
Alexey Portansky, a professor at HSE University and a leading researcher at IMEMO RAS, stated in an interview with MK that despite current challenges, the EU will overcome its difficulties and avoid collapse due to its strong foundation and history of integration.
- What is the central argument of Professor Portansky regarding the future of the European Union?
- Professor Portansky argues that despite the EU's current challenges, primarily stemming from the loss of cheap Russian gas and external shocks, the EU's strong foundation and history of integration will enable it to overcome these difficulties. He points to the EU's achievements in economics, law-making, and free movement as evidence of this resilience.
- What specific challenges does Professor Portansky highlight as impacting the EU, and how does he connect them to the EU's past?
- Portansky emphasizes the significant shock to the EU economy caused by the loss of cheap Russian gas, impacting both economic and social spheres. He contrasts this with the EU's long history of successful integration, highlighting the unprecedented nature of this challenge and the EU's ability to adapt.
- What are the long-term implications of Professor Portansky's analysis, and how does his perspective compare to other assessments?
- Portansky's optimistic outlook suggests that while recovery won't be immediate, the EU possesses the resilience to navigate its current crisis. This contrasts with more pessimistic predictions, but aligns with the EU's own acknowledgment of its problems, which Portansky views as a positive sign.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view by including the expert's opinion that the EU will overcome its challenges, while also mentioning a contrasting, more pessimistic view from a former Italian Prime Minister. The headline, "Удручающий итог эксперимента: ЕС распадется на три мини-союза", which translates to "Discouraging Result of the Experiment: EU Will Collapse into Three Mini-Unions," presents a negative framing, but the article itself provides counterarguments.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual. The expert's statements are presented without overt bias. The headline is the main exception, presenting a negative viewpoint.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the economic challenges faced by the EU, particularly regarding energy. Other potential factors contributing to the EU's difficulties (political, social, etc.) are largely omitted. This omission might lead to an incomplete understanding of the complexities involved.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the economic challenges faced by the European Union, particularly due to the loss of cheap Russian gas. These economic hardships can exacerbate existing inequalities within the EU, potentially impacting different socioeconomic groups disproportionately. While not a direct focus, the economic instability mentioned indirectly relates to SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by highlighting potential negative consequences for equitable distribution of resources and opportunities.