Experts Question the Value of Popular Dietary Supplements

Experts Question the Value of Popular Dietary Supplements

dailymail.co.uk

Experts Question the Value of Popular Dietary Supplements

Healthcare professionals express concerns over the widespread use of multivitamins and supplements, citing ineffectiveness and potential health risks, particularly from sugary gummy vitamins.

English
United Kingdom
HealthLifestylePublic HealthHealthcareNutritionWellnessSupplementsMultivitamins
American Heart AssociationUclaScripps Coastal Medical Center San MarcosJohns Hopkins University School Of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolConsumer ReportsFda
Amina KhanZariah ChappellEdgar MillerPieter Cohen
What specific types of supplements are highlighted as being particularly ineffective or potentially harmful?
Pharmacist Amina Khan highlights three supplement types to avoid: sugary gummy vitamins, multivitamins with negligible nutrient amounts, and ineffective hair, skin, and nail supplements.
What alternative approaches to improving hair, skin, and nail health, or overall nutritional needs are suggested by experts?
Studies show multivitamins have no impact on heart health, and hair, skin, and nail supplements lack sufficient target nutrient concentrations for effectiveness. Experts recommend targeted single-focus supplements instead.
What are the main concerns raised by healthcare professionals regarding the widespread use of dietary supplements and multivitamins?
Many Americans consume daily multivitamins and supplements despite medical professionals deeming many a waste of money.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the information around the negative aspects of supplement use, emphasizing the opinions of doctors and pharmacists who criticize the widespread use of supplements. This framing potentially underplays any positive aspects or balanced perspectives on the topic.

2/5

Language Bias

The article uses language that leans towards skepticism and negativity toward supplements. Terms such as "waste of money" and "sugar pill" subtly influence readers' perceptions and may create an unnecessary negative connotation.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on negative viewpoints towards supplements, omitting potential benefits for specific populations like pregnant women or those with deficiencies. This omission creates an unbalanced perspective and could lead readers to disregard supplements entirely, even when appropriate.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that either one takes multivitamins/supplements religiously or avoids them entirely. It neglects the nuanced approach of consulting a doctor to determine individual needs and appropriate supplementation.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights the potential harm and ineffectiveness of many common dietary supplements. Misinformation and overconsumption of supplements could negatively impact health outcomes.