repubblica.it
Extreme Weather Drives Global Food Price Spikes
A 2024 study reveals extreme weather events such as heatwaves and droughts between 2022 and 2024 caused significant food price increases globally, impacting various commodities like cabbage, rice, vegetables, olive oil, cocoa, and coffee due to reduced crop yields in concentrated production areas, highlighting the far-reaching impacts of climate change.
- What were the most significant impacts of extreme weather events on global food prices in 2022-2024?
- Extreme weather events in 2024 caused significant food price increases globally. In East Asia, heatwaves led to a 70% increase in cabbage prices in South Korea, a 48% rise in rice prices in Japan, and a 30% surge in vegetable costs in China between June and August. The US also experienced an 80% increase in vegetable prices between November 2021 and November 2022 due to an unprecedented drought in California and Arizona in 2022.
- What are the long-term economic and social consequences of climate change-induced food price inflation?
- The study highlights the cascading effects of climate change on global food security. The persistent inflation from extreme weather events (lasting up to 12 months) affects both high- and low-income countries, impacting not only food prices but also broader economic sectors. Further research is needed to fully understand the interconnected impacts of climate and non-climate shocks.
- How did concentrated production areas for specific commodities contribute to price volatility during extreme weather events?
- These price increases are directly linked to extreme weather conditions. The study analyzed 16 cases globally where heatwaves, droughts, and heavy rainfall significantly impacted food prices between 2022 and 2024. Concentrated production areas, like those for cocoa (Ghana and Ivory Coast) and coffee (Vietnam and Brazil), experienced price volatility due to extreme weather in these regions.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the negative impacts of climate change on food prices, which is supported by the presented data. However, the headline or introduction could be improved to include a more balanced presentation by mentioning that the study focuses only on a selection of cases where impact was easily observable. This would reduce the risk of being perceived as overly alarmist.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective, using precise figures and quotes from researchers to support its claims. Words like "without precedent" or "severe", while descriptive, are used to describe the events objectively, not to manipulate reader perception. However, consistently mentioning high temperatures as "unprecedented" might subconsciously imply a more severe climate impact.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the price increases of specific commodities due to extreme weather events, but it could benefit from including a discussion of potential mitigating factors or adaptation strategies employed by farmers or governments. While it mentions transportation costs and high tourist demand in Japan, a broader analysis of global trade disruptions and geopolitical factors influencing food prices would enrich the report. The omission of information on government policies related to food security or subsidies might limit the reader's understanding of the overall situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights how extreme weather events, exacerbated by climate change, caused significant price increases in various staple food commodities globally. This directly impacts food security and access to nutritious food, particularly for vulnerable populations. Increased food prices due to climate change-related events threaten the ability of many to afford adequate food, leading to malnutrition and hunger.