sueddeutsche.de
Famine Declared in Sudan Amidst Civil War
Independent experts confirmed a famine in at least five areas of Sudan, affecting over 600,000 people due to the ongoing civil war and limited humanitarian access; the UN anticipates the famine to spread further by May 2025, with over 24.6 million people suffering from acute food insecurity.
- How does the ongoing civil war contribute to the severity and spread of the famine in Sudan?
- The famine in Sudan is a direct consequence of the ongoing civil war between Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, which has led to mass displacement and severely restricted humanitarian aid. This conflict has created widespread food insecurity, impacting more than 24.6 million people—over half the Sudanese population—with 8.1 million in acute emergency.
- What is the immediate impact of the declared famine in Sudan, and how many people are affected?
- A famine has been declared in at least five areas of Sudan, affecting over 600,000 people, due to the ongoing civil war and limited humanitarian access. The UN's World Food Programme (WFP) and UNICEF confirmed this, noting that the crisis is worsening despite it being harvest season. This comes after a famine was first reported in August in the SamSam refugee camp.
- What are the projected long-term consequences of the ongoing crisis in Sudan, and what level of intervention is necessary to prevent further suffering?
- The situation in Sudan is expected to deteriorate further, with projections of famine in additional areas by May 2025. The ongoing conflict, coupled with the already catastrophic conditions, threatens to cause widespread death due to starvation and malnutrition unless there's a significant intervention. The scale of the crisis necessitates an urgent and large-scale humanitarian response.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is largely neutral, focusing on the factual reporting of the famine's severity and its impact on the Sudanese population. The use of quotes from UN organizations and experts adds to the article's credibility and reinforces the seriousness of the situation. The headline accurately reflects the content.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, employing factual reporting and quotes from authoritative sources. The article uses terms like "catastrophic hunger" and "extreme food shortages", which accurately reflect the severity of the situation, without resorting to emotionally charged language.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the severity of the famine and the humanitarian crisis in Sudan, providing statistics and expert quotes. However, it could benefit from including information on the initiatives taken by the Sudanese government or other international organizations to address the situation, or the challenges in providing aid. Additionally, while the conflict is mentioned as a root cause, a deeper exploration of the political dynamics and their impact on aid distribution could provide more context.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article reports a famine in Sudan, affecting over 600,000 people and placing millions more at risk of acute food insecurity. This directly contradicts SDG 2, aiming to end hunger and ensure access to safe, nutritious food for all.