sueddeutsche.de
Famine Declared in Sudan Amidst Ongoing Conflict
A famine has been declared in at least five areas of Sudan, affecting over 600,000 people, with an additional 8.1 million facing acute food insecurity, exceeding the highest level on the IPC scale, due to ongoing conflict and displacement.
- What is the extent and severity of the famine in Sudan, and what are its immediate consequences?
- Independent experts have confirmed famine criteria in at least five Sudanese areas, affecting over 600,000 people, including refugee camps in North Darfur and potentially parts of Khartoum. This escalation is alarming as it occurs during the usual harvest season.
- How did the ongoing conflict in Sudan contribute to this widespread famine, and what are the underlying factors?
- The famine in Sudan, classified as IPC Phase 5, the highest level, signifies extreme food shortages affecting at least 20% of households, with daily adult and child deaths exceeding thresholds. This crisis affects at least 638,000 people, with 8.1 million more in acute emergency (IPC Phase 4).
- What are the projected future impacts of this famine, and what interventions are crucial to mitigate the crisis in the medium to long term?
- The ongoing conflict in Sudan severely hinders aid delivery, causing this catastrophic famine during harvest season. The projection of famine in five more North Darfur areas by May 2025, along with potential famine in Khartoum and Al Jazirah, underscores the urgency of large-scale humanitarian intervention and conflict resolution.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the severity of the famine, using strong terms like "catastrophic hunger" and highlighting the alarming escalation. This emphasizes the negative impact but might overshadow potential positive developments or aid efforts.
Language Bias
Words like "catastrophic hunger" and "alarming escalation" contribute to a tone of alarm. While accurate, these terms could be replaced with more neutral descriptions, such as "widespread hunger" and "significant increase.
Bias by Omission
The report focuses on the severity and geographic spread of the famine in Sudan, but omits potential contributing factors such as the political conflict and its impact on food production and distribution. While acknowledging the limitations of space, exploring the root causes would provide a more comprehensive understanding.
False Dichotomy
The text presents the famine as a stark reality without exploring potential mitigating factors or interventions beyond the UN's response. A more nuanced presentation could acknowledge both the crisis and efforts to alleviate it.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article reports a famine in Sudan, affecting over 600,000 people and bringing the total number of people facing famine-like conditions to at least 638,000. This directly contradicts SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) which aims to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. The situation described represents a severe setback to achieving this goal. The article also mentions 8.1 million people in acute emergency, and over 24.6 million facing acute food insecurity.