FDA Warns of Serious Side Effects from Online Topical Finasteride

FDA Warns of Serious Side Effects from Online Topical Finasteride

dailymail.co.uk

FDA Warns of Serious Side Effects from Online Topical Finasteride

The FDA warned about serious side effects, including sexual dysfunction and suicidal ideation, from unapproved topical finasteride hair-loss treatments sold online by telehealth companies like Hims, Hers, and Ro, with 32 complaints filed between 2019 and 2024.

English
United Kingdom
TechnologyHealthTelehealthSide EffectsHair LossFda WarningHimsFinasterideHersRo
FdaHimsHersRoCedars-Sinai Medical CenterEpic ResearchWall Street JournalDailymail.com
Mark MillichJustin Houman
What are the immediate health risks and regulatory concerns surrounding the online sale of unapproved topical finasteride products?
The FDA issued a warning about serious side effects from topical finasteride, an unapproved hair-loss drug sold online by companies like Hims, Hers, and Ro. Thirty-two complaints were filed between 2019 and 2024, detailing issues like erectile dysfunction, depression, and suicidal thoughts; some effects persisted after stopping use. The FDA also highlights the risk of fetal abnormalities in pregnant women.
How do the reported side effects of topical finasteride compare to those of FDA-approved oral finasteride, and what factors contribute to the discrepancy in reported adverse events?
These unapproved topical finasteride products, despite requiring online consultations, lack sufficient warnings about potential side effects. This inadequate information, coupled with the ease of access via telehealth platforms, raises concerns about informed consent and patient safety. The reported persistence of side effects even after discontinuation further emphasizes the severity of the issue.
What long-term systemic changes, including regulatory and healthcare practice modifications, are needed to mitigate the risks associated with online access to medications with potentially severe side effects?
The increasing accessibility of finasteride through telehealth platforms, combined with insufficient patient education regarding the risks, suggests a need for stronger regulatory oversight and improved patient information protocols. The long-term health consequences, including Post-Finasteride Syndrome (PFS), necessitate further research and proactive measures to protect consumers.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The headline and introduction immediately highlight the FDA warning and the severe side effects, creating a negative framing. The article's structure prioritizes negative accounts and expert opinions that emphasize the risks. Positive aspects, potential benefits, or alternative viewpoints are largely absent. The inclusion of a specific negative case study (Mark Millich) further reinforces this bias.

4/5

Language Bias

The article uses loaded language such as "crippling side effects," "serious risks," "ruined their lives," and "dangerous side effects." These terms evoke strong negative emotions and lack objectivity. Neutral alternatives would include 'reported side effects,' 'potential risks,' 'negative experiences,' and 'adverse events.' The repeated use of negative descriptions contributes to a biased narrative.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the negative side effects of topical finasteride, but omits discussion of the potential benefits or success rates for those who use it without experiencing adverse effects. It also doesn't provide a balanced perspective on the frequency of these side effects, only mentioning that they affect "one in 100 WOMEN? and one in 10 men", which is vague and requires further clarification. The article mentions FDA-approved oral versions, but doesn't discuss their side effect profiles in comparison, which could provide valuable context.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by focusing almost exclusively on the negative aspects of topical finasteride, without providing sufficient information on alternative treatments or approaches to hair loss. It implies that the only options are using this drug with potentially severe consequences or accepting hair loss, neglecting other methods.

2/5

Gender Bias

While the article mentions both men and women are affected, the overwhelming focus is on the experiences of men. The ambiguous phrasing of 'one in 100 WOMEN?' suggests a possible lack of reliable data for women's experiences. The article could benefit from more balanced representation of both genders' experiences with the drug's side effects and a more precise quantification of female users' adverse effects.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights the severe side effects of topical finasteride, including erectile dysfunction, anxiety, suicidal ideation, depression, and persistent symptoms even after discontinuation. These negative impacts on mental and physical health directly contradict the SDG target of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages.