it.euronews.com
Five Femicides in Portugal Since January 2024
At least five women have been murdered by men in Portugal since the beginning of 2024; victims ranged from 17 to 72 years old, with several cases involving domestic violence; incidents occurred in Lisbon, Barreiro, Sesimbra, Braga, and Porto.
- What are the long-term societal impacts of these femicides and what systemic changes are needed to effectively address this issue?
- The case of the 65-year-old cancer patient murdered in a hospital points to the vulnerability of women in various settings. The ongoing investigations and the range of ages of victims underscore the pervasive nature of gender-based violence, requiring comprehensive preventative measures and support systems.
- What are the immediate consequences of the increasing number of femicides in Portugal in terms of public safety and social response?
- At least five women have been killed by men in Portugal since the beginning of the year, according to Euronews' analysis of news reports and Portuguese Judicial Police statements. The victims ranged in age from 17 to 72. The first femicide involved an 80-year-old man killing his 72-year-old wife on January 7th in Lisbon.
- What are the underlying causes of these femicides, particularly those occurring in domestic settings, and what preventative measures are currently in place or under consideration?
- Several of these femicides occurred within domestic contexts, highlighting the ongoing issue of domestic violence in Portugal. The January 9th murder involved a husband killing his wife in front of their children, and the January 30th incident saw a man murder his wife and stepdaughter before committing suicide.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the violence against women, which is appropriate given the subject matter. However, the repeated mention of the ages of the victims might inadvertently perpetuate victim-blaming narratives. The focus on the brutality of the crimes could also unintentionally sensationalize the violence.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual. However, terms like "aggredita" (assaulted) and descriptions of the violence could be considered slightly loaded depending on the context and translation. More neutral phrasing might be considered.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on reported cases of femicide and doesn't delve into broader societal factors like gender inequality, cultural norms, or the availability of support services for victims of domestic violence, which could provide a more complete understanding of the issue. While the article mentions domestic violence in some cases, it lacks a broader analysis of this context as a contributing factor.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it could benefit from acknowledging the complexities of domestic violence and femicide, avoiding a simplistic portrayal of perpetrators as solely malicious actors and victims as entirely helpless.
Gender Bias
The article appropriately highlights the gendered nature of the violence by focusing on femicide. However, it could benefit from including perspectives from women's rights organizations or experts to offer deeper analysis and potential solutions. The article focuses on the actions of the perpetrators without exploring the systemic issues.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article reports on multiple cases of femicide and domestic violence in Portugal, highlighting the urgent need to address gender-based violence and protect women and girls. These crimes directly hinder progress towards gender equality and women's safety.