liberation.fr
France's Elevated Terrorism Threat: Jihadist and Far-Right Extremism
France's terrorism threat level remains \"very high\" in 2024 due to the Middle East conflict escalation and the rise of jihadist and far-right extremism; 59 jihadist-related cases were opened in 2024, with 18 minors involved, while 15 far-right cases were opened in the last 10 years.
- What are the most significant factors contributing to France's elevated terrorism threat level in 2024?
- Ten years after a wave of deadly attacks in 2015, France's threat level remains \"very high\". The National Anti-Terrorist Prosecutor's Office (Pnat) cites the escalating conflict in the Middle East, particularly since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack in Israel, as a key factor. Only one antisemitic attack has occurred since then: an attack on a synagogue in late August 2024.
- How do the numbers of terrorism-related cases in recent years compare, and what are the key concerns related to the evolving situation in Syria and the potential resurgence of ISIS?
- The Pnat opened 59 jihadist-related cases in 2024, compared to 48 in 2021, 41 in 2022, and 38 in 2023. 87% of all cases opened are jihadist-related. Concerns also include the evolving situation in Syria following the fall of Bashar al-Assad and the rise of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, as well as the potential resurgence of ISIS and the return of French fighters from Syria.
- What are the main characteristics and trends regarding the profiles of those involved in jihadist and far-right extremist activities in France, and what are the implications for future security strategies?
- The increasing number of minors involved in terrorism is alarming. In 2023, 15 minors were indicted on terrorism charges, rising to 18 in 2024. These individuals, often radicalized online, present a significant challenge. The far-right also poses a threat, though fewer cases (15 in 10 years) are currently active. The accelerationist ideology, aiming to provoke inter-community conflict, is of particular concern.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the threat of Jihadist terrorism as significantly more prevalent and dangerous than right-wing extremism. The sheer number of statistics and details dedicated to Jihadist activities, in comparison to the limited information on right-wing extremism, underscores this bias. The headline (if any) and introduction likely emphasized the Jihadist threat, further solidifying this framing.
Language Bias
The language used to describe Jihadist terrorism tends to be stronger and more alarmist than the language used for right-wing extremism. Terms such as "very high threat" and detailed statistics related to procedures and arrests are mostly linked to Jihadist activity. The description of right-wing extremism, while highlighting specific incidents, uses milder terms and less statistical data. This creates a discrepancy in the perceived severity of both threats.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on Jihadist threats, mentioning the rise in procedures related to this type of terrorism. However, it omits discussion of the broader context of right-wing extremism beyond the specific cases mentioned. While the article notes the existence of right-wing extremist threats and provides some examples, a more comprehensive analysis of their prevalence, methods, and potential impact would offer a more balanced perspective. The lack of detailed information about other potential threats, such as those from anarchist or other far-left groups, also limits the scope of the analysis. This omission might lead the reader to believe that Jihadist and right-wing extremism are the only significant threats.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between Jihadist and right-wing extremist threats, potentially simplifying the complex landscape of terrorism and neglecting other potential threats. While these two are highlighted, other forms of extremism or politically motivated violence are largely ignored, creating a false impression of a limited threat spectrum.
Gender Bias
The analysis lacks specific details on gender representation within both Jihadist and right-wing extremist groups. While the article mentions that the profiles for both are 'mostly male', it does not delve into the roles, involvement, or representation of women within these groups. This omission prevents a complete understanding of gender dynamics within these movements.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the persistent threat of terrorism in France, indicating a failure to fully achieve SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. The increase in jihadist procedures and the ongoing threat from extremist groups demonstrate a lack of progress towards a peaceful and secure society. The mention of the "accelerationist" trend within the far-right also underscores the challenge of preventing violence and promoting inclusive institutions.