lemonde.fr
France's "Mon soutien psy" program: High dropout rate raises concerns
France's "Mon soutien psy" program, launched in 2021 to address mental health issues, shows a high dropout rate (75%) despite 600,000 users, raising concerns about its effectiveness and the need for systemic improvements.
- What are the immediate consequences of the low completion rate and high dropout rate in France's "Mon soutien psy" program?
- France's public psychiatric system is deteriorating, with staff shortages and facility closures despite rising mental health issues. The "Mon soutien psy" initiative, aiming to improve access to psychological care, has shown disappointing results, with only a quarter of patients completing the planned therapy sessions.
- How do the reported patient satisfaction levels compare to scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of psychotherapy, and what are the implications?
- While 600,000 French citizens used "Mon soutien psy", the high dropout rate (75%) and low session completion (average 4.8 out of 12) contradict claims of success. This raises concerns about inadequate care and challenges the notion that early termination indicates effectiveness.
- What systemic changes are needed to improve the effectiveness and accessibility of mental healthcare in France, considering the shortcomings of the "Mon soutien psy" initiative?
- The low patient satisfaction survey (10 participants) and high dropout rate suggest "Mon soutien psy" needs significant improvement. Future success requires addressing systemic issues like insufficient funding and therapist shortages to ensure adequate and effective mental healthcare.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the "Mon soutien psy" program negatively from the outset, highlighting the pre-existing issues in the French public mental health system and immediately questioning the program's efficacy. The headline (if any) and opening paragraphs would likely reinforce this negative framing, focusing on shortcomings rather than potential successes. The inclusion of statistics on low completion rates early on further strengthens this negative perspective.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "décevante" (disappointing), "inquiétante" (worrying), and "échec" (failure) to describe the program's performance. These words carry negative connotations and shape the reader's perception negatively. Neutral alternatives could include words such as "unsuccessful in meeting initial goals" or "demonstrates areas for improvement.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the shortcomings of the "Mon soutien psy" program, citing low patient completion rates and questioning the methodology of a positive patient survey. However, it omits discussion of potential positive impacts of the program, such as the number of people who did receive some benefit from the limited sessions offered, or the perspectives of the psychologists involved. The article also doesn't explore alternative solutions or policy proposals in detail, thus limiting a complete understanding of the issue beyond the program's flaws.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the success of the program solely on the completion rate of the twelve sessions. It ignores the possibility that even partial participation might provide some benefit to patients. The article contrasts the low completion rate with the minister's claim of success, implying only one of these perspectives can be true, ignoring the complexity of assessing the program's effectiveness.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses Frances's initiative "Mon soutien psy", aimed at improving access to mental healthcare. While the program shows a high demand, its effectiveness is questionable due to high dropout rates and a low number of patients completing the recommended therapy sessions. The program aims to address the concerning mental health trends in France, aligning with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) which targets improved mental health and well-being. However, the significant shortcomings in implementation raise concerns about the actual impact on achieving this goal.