lentreprise.lexpress.fr
French Used Book Market Boom Threatens Publishing Industry
Used book sales in France have doubled in a decade, reaching 8-9% of the market's value, driven by online platforms, and challenging the publishing industry's revenue and the 'loi Lang' on fixed book pricing.
- What is the impact of the growing used book market on the French publishing industry?
- The French book market is experiencing a surge in used book sales, reaching 8-9% of total book sales value and doubling in volume over 10 years. This is driven by online platforms like Leboncoin and Vinted, where millions of used books are listed, impacting publishers' revenue.
- How has the rise of online platforms like Leboncoin and Vinted contributed to the increase in used book sales in France?
- This growth in the used book market is a significant threat to the publishing industry, impacting publishers, authors, and booksellers, particularly in genres like detective novels and comics. The phenomenon is not limited to older books; 40-50% of used book listings are in very good or like-new condition, including books less than a year old.
- What potential solutions are being considered to address the challenges posed by the expanding used book market to the French publishing industry, and what are the obstacles?
- The rising popularity of used books, especially on online platforms, challenges the French 'loi Lang' (law on the fixed book price), which protects publishers and booksellers. Proposed solutions include a tax on used book platforms to benefit creators, but this faces legal hurdles and political opposition. The situation highlights the need for the publishing industry to adapt to evolving consumer behavior.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the growth of the used book market as primarily a negative phenomenon, emphasizing the anxieties and economic losses of publishers and authors. The use of words like "panic," "threat," and "grignote" (gnaws) sets a negative tone from the start, influencing the reader's perception of the issue. While acknowledging the concerns of the publishing industry is important, the framing could be more balanced to present a less alarmist perspective.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language to portray the used book market negatively. Terms such as "panique" (panic), "menace" (threat), and "grignote" (gnaws) create a sense of alarm and crisis. More neutral terms could be used, such as "rapid growth," "challenge," or "impact." The repeated emphasis on financial losses also contributes to a negative portrayal.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the concerns of publishers and authors regarding the growth of the used book market, but it omits perspectives from used book buyers. Their motivations for purchasing used books (e.g., affordability, environmental concerns) are not explored in detail. The article also doesn't address the potential benefits of the used book market, such as increased accessibility to literature. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, a broader range of viewpoints would strengthen the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the used book market as a direct threat to the new book market, implying a zero-sum game. It overlooks the potential for these markets to coexist and even complement each other. The article doesn't fully explore the possibility that some individuals might buy both new and used books depending on factors such as price and availability.
Sustainable Development Goals
The rise of the used book market disproportionately affects lower-income individuals and those who rely on affordable access to books. While initially perceived as a democratizing force, the data reveals that used book purchases are higher among higher socioeconomic groups, potentially widening the gap in access to new literature and hindering efforts to promote inclusivity and equal opportunities in the literary world.