Future of Jobs Report 2025: 170 Million New Jobs, 92 Million Lost

Future of Jobs Report 2025: 170 Million New Jobs, 92 Million Lost

nrc.nl

Future of Jobs Report 2025: 170 Million New Jobs, 92 Million Lost

The World Economic Forum's 2025 Future of Jobs Report forecasts 170 million new jobs and 92 million job losses by 2030 due to automation and digitalization, primarily impacting administrative roles while boosting demand for technology specialists.

Dutch
Netherlands
EconomyTechnologyArtificial IntelligenceAutomationJob MarketDigitalizationFuture Of WorkSkills Gap
World Economic Forum (Wef)IngAmsterdam Centre For Business InnovationUva
Henk Volberda
How will the predicted job market transformation affect different industries and regions, and what challenges do businesses face in adapting?
The report highlights the increasing demand for specialists in big data, fintech, and AI/machine learning, while roles like postal workers, bank tellers, and data typists are expected to decline. This reflects the broader trend of automation and digital transformation across industries.
What are the most significant job losses and gains predicted by the World Economic Forum's report, and what are the primary drivers of this shift?
The World Economic Forum's 2025 Future of Jobs Report predicts a significant shift in the job market by 2030, with 170 million new jobs created, primarily in technology, while 92 million jobs, mainly administrative, will be lost. This transformation will be driven by digitalization and automation, impacting 60 percent of employers.
What are the long-term societal and economic implications of this predicted job market reshaping, considering the need for reskilling and the potential for widening inequalities?
By 2030, only one-third of all work tasks in companies will be performed entirely by humans, a decrease from nearly half currently. This underscores the urgent need for reskilling and upskilling initiatives to bridge the gap between disappearing and emerging roles, with 39 percent of current worker skills projected to become obsolete by 2030.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article's framing emphasizes the opportunities presented by technological advancements, highlighting the growth of technology-related jobs and the positive aspects of digitalization. While it acknowledges job losses, the overall tone and emphasis lean towards a positive outlook on the future of work, potentially downplaying the challenges and anxieties associated with job displacement. The headline, if there was one, would likely reinforce this positive spin. The introduction itself, focusing on the top three disappearing jobs and the top three rising jobs, already sets this tone.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral and objective, presenting statistics and expert opinions. However, phrases like "vaarwel" (farewell) in the introduction create a slightly negative connotation towards the disappearing jobs. The use of "verdwijnen" (disappear) repeatedly in relation to jobs could heighten anxiety. While the article aims for objectivity, the choice of words subtly influences the reader's perception of the situation.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses primarily on the impact of digitalization on the job market, highlighting job losses in certain sectors and the rise of new technological roles. While it mentions the need for reskilling and upskilling, it doesn't delve into the potential social and economic consequences for individuals displaced by automation, such as increased inequality or the challenges of transitioning to new careers. The lack of detail on support systems or government initiatives to mitigate these effects represents a bias by omission.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between jobs lost due to automation and new jobs created in technology. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of the transition, such as the potential for skill gaps, the geographical distribution of new jobs, or the possibility that some displaced workers may not have the skills or opportunities to fill these new roles. This oversimplification could mislead readers into believing the shift will be smooth and straightforward.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article doesn't explicitly mention gender bias. However, analyzing the jobs mentioned (post office staff, bank employees, data typists, big data specialists, fintech experts, AI and machine learning experts) reveals a potential for implicit gender bias. Some roles (e.g., data typists, administrative assistants) have historically been associated with women, suggesting a potential disproportionate impact on women. A more in-depth analysis of gender representation across all job categories mentioned would be needed for a definitive assessment.

Sustainable Development Goals

Decent Work and Economic Growth Positive
Direct Relevance

The article highlights the creation of 170 million new jobs in the next five years, mainly in technological fields. This directly contributes to decent work and economic growth by increasing employment opportunities and potentially improving wages and working conditions in emerging sectors. However, it also notes the loss of 92 million jobs in administrative and secretarial roles, highlighting the need for reskilling and upskilling initiatives to mitigate negative impacts.