Future of the Gülen Movement After Gülen's Death

Future of the Gülen Movement After Gülen's Death

bbc.com

Future of the Gülen Movement After Gülen's Death

Analysis of the potential future of the Gülen movement following the death of its leader, Fethullah Gülen, including discussions of leadership succession, future activities, and relations with the Turkish government.

Turkish
United Kingdom
PoliticsInternational RelationsTurkeyLeadership SuccessionFetöGülen MovementFethullah GülenReligious MovementPolitical MovementPost-Death Analysis
The Alliance For Shared ValuesZaman GazetesiAkp
Fethullah GülenMustafa ÖzcanCevdet TürkyoluAbdullah AymazSeyfullah GülenMahmud Esad CoşanRecep Tayyip ErdoğanHakan FidanSaid-I Nursi
Who will lead the Gülen movement after Fethullah Gülen's death?
Following Fethullah Gülen's death, his movement's future is uncertain, with questions surrounding its leadership and direction.
What is the future of the Gülen movement in Turkey and internationally?
An executive committee is believed to have assumed leadership before Gülen's death, though there are conflicting reports of internal power struggles. The movement's future direction and activities remain unclear.
What kind of activities will the Gülen movement focus on in the future?
The movement's future in Turkey appears bleak due to its association with the 2016 coup attempt, while its international influence is limited and may be waning as younger generations become less involved.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the Gülen movement primarily as a "terrorist organization," reflecting the Turkish government's perspective. This framing could overshadow more nuanced understandings of the movement's activities and impacts.

3/5

Language Bias

The article uses terms like "Fethullahçı Terör Örgütü" (FETÖ), which is a label used by the Turkish government, potentially framing the movement negatively without offering alternative perspectives on its actions.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on allegations and statements from those critical of the Gülen movement, potentially omitting counterarguments or perspectives from within the group that could offer a more balanced view.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by suggesting that the movement's future will either be defined by internal power struggles or by seamless continuation under the existing executive committee. It neglects the possibility of other outcomes.