Gabbard Nominated for National Intelligence Post

Gabbard Nominated for National Intelligence Post

bbc.com

Gabbard Nominated for National Intelligence Post

Tulsi Gabbard's nomination to head the Office of National Intelligence raises concerns about her lack of experience and past statements echoing Russian propaganda.

Persian
United Kingdom
PoliticsUs PoliticsRussiaUkraineControversyIntelligence
Office Of National IntelligenceCiaFbiNsaRepublican Party
Tulsi GabbardDonald TrumpBashar Al-AssadVladimir PutinJoe Biden
Who is Tulsi Gabbard and what is her background?
Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman, has been nominated by President-elect Trump to head the Office of National Intelligence. This position oversees all US intelligence agencies and requires Senate confirmation.
What are Gabbard's past controversial statements on Syria and Ukraine?
Gabbard's controversial statements regarding Russia's invasion of Ukraine have been heavily criticized. She suggested that the US and its allies should have recognized Russia's security concerns and that US-funded biological laboratories in Ukraine posed a threat.
What are the main concerns and criticisms regarding Gabbard's nomination?
Before her nomination, Gabbard served in the US Army in Iraq, then served in the Hawaii State Legislature and as a US Representative for Hawaii. She was a Democrat, but switched to the Republican party recently, becoming a vocal supporter of Donald Trump.
What is the position she has been nominated for and what are its responsibilities?
Gabbard's nomination has raised concerns due to her lack of intelligence experience and past accusations of echoing Russian propaganda. Critics point to her past statements supporting Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad and questioning US intelligence findings on chemical weapons attacks.
What is the significance of Gabbard's nomination and what are the potential implications?
If confirmed, Gabbard would oversee a $70 billion budget for 18 intelligence agencies. Her nomination has drawn strong reactions from both sides, with some praising her and others expressing serious concern and alarm about her qualifications and past statements.