Garland's "Oz" Slippers Fetch \$32.5 Million at Auction

Garland's "Oz" Slippers Fetch \$32.5 Million at Auction

cbsnews.com

Garland's "Oz" Slippers Fetch \$32.5 Million at Auction

A pair of ruby slippers worn by Judy Garland in "The Wizard of Oz," stolen from a museum in 2005 and recovered in 2018, sold for \$32.5 million at auction, exceeding initial estimates by more than ten times and reflecting the enduring cultural significance of the film.

English
United States
EntertainmentArts And CultureCrimeAuctionWizard Of OzJudy GarlandRuby SlippersHollywood Memorabilia
Heritage AuctionsJudy Garland MuseumFbi
Judy GarlandTerry Jon MartinDane DekreyJerry Hal SalitermanMichael ShawMargaret Hamilton
What was the final sale price of the ruby slippers, and what factors contributed to this value?
In a recent auction, a pair of ruby slippers worn by Judy Garland in "The Wizard of Oz" sold for \$32.5 million, exceeding initial estimates by over tenfold. This significantly high price reflects the cultural significance of the iconic movie and the rarity of the surviving footwear.
How did the slippers' theft and recovery impact their eventual sale price and public perception?
The slippers' journey, from theft in 2005 to recovery in 2018 and eventual auction, highlights the enduring appeal of "The Wizard of Oz." Their sale also underscores the lucrative nature of Hollywood memorabilia, particularly items associated with beloved classics.
What does the high sale price suggest about the future market for classic Hollywood memorabilia and museum acquisition strategies?
The auction's success, fueled by renewed interest in "The Wizard of Oz" due to the release of "Wicked," suggests a sustained market for such artifacts. This could influence future valuations of similar memorabilia and potentially impact museum acquisition strategies.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The narrative is structured around the dramatic arc of the theft, recovery, and auction of the slippers. The headline emphasizes the $28 million price tag, immediately grabbing the reader's attention and framing the story as a financial success. The inclusion of details about online bidding and page views further emphasizes the commercial aspects of the story.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and factual, but phrases like "one last score" when describing the thief's motivation might subtly portray the crime as somewhat exciting or adventurous rather than purely criminal. The description of the thieves' poor health at sentencing could be seen as eliciting sympathy.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the theft and recovery of the ruby slippers, and the auction. While it mentions the Judy Garland Museum's attempt to repurchase them, it doesn't delve into the museum's overall financial situation or the broader implications of the auction for museum security and artifact preservation. The connection to the release of "Wicked" is mentioned but not explored in depth, potentially neglecting an important cultural context influencing the auction's high price.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article focuses primarily on the actions of men involved in the theft and auction; Judy Garland's role is largely confined to her connection to the slippers. While mentioning Garland's hometown museum's effort to buy back the slippers, the article doesn't explore gender roles in the film or any relevant gender themes.

Sustainable Development Goals

Reduced Inequality Positive
Indirect Relevance

The auction and subsequent donation to the Judy Garland Museum could contribute to the economic revitalization of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, potentially reducing income inequality within the community. The museum