elpais.com
Gatsby in 2025: Trump's Parallel to Fitzgerald's Masterpiece
One hundred years after its publication, F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby" continues to resonate, with the author drawing parallels between the novel's protagonist, Jay Gatsby, and Donald Trump, highlighting their shared flawed relationship with wealth and its corrupting influence on power.
- What specific aspects of Gatsby's and Trump's behaviors and beliefs reveal a distorted view of money's role in power and morality?
- The article uses Gatsby and Trump's pursuit of wealth and power to illustrate the corrupting influence of money. Gatsby's belief that money could buy Daisy's love, and Trump's apparent belief that wealth protects him from consequences, exemplify the moral failings of unchecked capitalism.
- How does the comparison between Gatsby and Trump illuminate the enduring relevance of "The Great Gatsby" in the context of modern American society?
- The Great Gatsby", published 100 years ago, remains relevant due to its timeless themes. The author compares Gatsby to Donald Trump, highlighting their shared flawed identities and problematic views on money. Both characters believe wealth grants them unlimited power and immunity from consequences.
- What long-term consequences might arise from a societal acceptance of wealth as a shield against ethical accountability, as exemplified by the Gatsby-Trump comparison?
- The comparison between Gatsby and Trump suggests that the American capitalist system's inherent flaws, as depicted in Fitzgerald's novel, persist. Trump's election, according to the author, reflects the normalization of a money-driven ideology where ethical considerations are secondary.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing heavily emphasizes the parallel between Gatsby and Trump, using this comparison as the central argument to interpret the novel. The introduction immediately establishes this parallel, guiding the reader's interpretation towards this specific lens. This framing might limit the exploration of other potential interpretations of the novel.
Language Bias
The language used is strong and opinionated, reflecting a clear bias towards a negative interpretation of both Gatsby and Trump. Words like "repugnant," "inmoral," and "fallido" carry strong negative connotations and shape the reader's perception. More neutral language could be used to present a balanced perspective.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on comparing Gatsby and Trump, neglecting other potential interpretations of Gatsby's character and the novel's themes. It omits discussion of other societal critiques present in the novel beyond the critique of capitalism. The comparison to Trump might overshadow other relevant contemporary applications of the novel's themes.
False Dichotomy
The essay presents a somewhat false dichotomy by framing Gatsby's pursuit of Daisy solely through the lens of his wealth, neglecting the complexities of his emotional motivations and the societal constraints of the time. It simplifies the relationship between wealth and morality into an eitheor scenario, ignoring the nuances of human behavior and the influence of other factors.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article draws a parallel between Gatsby and Trump, highlighting how wealth enables a disregard for morality and ethical consequences. This reinforces the negative impact of wealth inequality, where the wealthy operate outside the constraints faced by the less fortunate, thus undermining fair and just societies. The quote "Las desgracias, en el mundo de Trump, son solo para los pobres" directly reflects this.