lexpress.fr
Gaza Civilian Casualties Exceed 80%, Israeli Database Shows
An investigation using a classified Israeli military intelligence database reveals that over 80% of the Palestinians killed in Gaza by Israeli airstrikes are civilians, a ratio described as extremely high for a modern war, even compared to conflicts known for indiscriminate killings, raising serious concerns about the proportionality and targeting of Israeli military operations.
- How does the civilian casualty ratio in Gaza compare to other modern conflicts, and what factors might contribute to this disparity?
- The Guardian's investigation highlights a stark disparity: while Israeli data shows 8,900 Palestinian fighters killed, Gazan health authorities reported 53,000 Palestinian deaths in May 2024. This implies that 83% of the total deaths were civilians, a ratio described as extremely high for modern warfare, even compared to conflicts known for indiscriminate killings.
- What is the percentage of civilian casualties in Gaza resulting from Israeli airstrikes, according to the investigation, and what are the immediate implications of this finding?
- An investigation by The Guardian, using a classified Israeli military intelligence database, reveals that over 80% of those killed in Gaza by Israeli bombing are civilians. This represents five out of six Palestinians killed. The database lists 8,900 Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad fighters as dead or likely dead as of May 2024.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of such a high civilian casualty rate in Gaza, including political, humanitarian, and legal implications, and how might this impact future conflict resolution efforts?
- The consistent high civilian casualty rate over 22 months of conflict raises serious concerns about the proportionality and targeting of Israeli military operations in Gaza. The lack of response from Israeli authorities, beyond contesting the article's accuracy, warrants further investigation into the methods and justifications for these actions and their long-term implications.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and opening paragraph highlight the extremely high civilian casualty rate, immediately setting a critical tone towards Israel. The use of terms like "massacre" and the strong emphasis on the Guardian's access to classified information are framing choices that influence the reader's perception of the events, emphasizing the negative impact on Palestinian civilians. The article's structure further prioritizes the civilian casualties over other potentially relevant aspects of the conflict.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language, such as "massacre" and "extremely high", which carry strong negative connotations. These words convey a judgment on the actions of the Israeli military and influence the reader's emotional response. More neutral alternatives could be 'high civilian death toll' instead of 'massacre' and 'substantial' instead of 'extremely high'. The repeated emphasis on the civilian casualty rate also creates a negative bias, even if the underlying numbers are accurate.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the high civilian casualty rate reported by The Guardian's investigation, but omits potential counterarguments or alternative interpretations of the data from the Israeli perspective. While Israeli authorities disputed the accuracy of the numbers, their specific counter-data or methodology is not included. The omission of this crucial information might limit the reader's ability to form a fully balanced opinion.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat dichotomous portrayal by strongly emphasizing the high civilian casualty rate and implicitly framing the conflict as a disproportionate use of force against civilians by Israel. The complexity of the conflict, including Hamas's actions and Israel's security concerns, is not adequately explored, creating a simplified eitheor narrative.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the disproportionate number of Palestinian civilian casualties in the Gaza conflict, indicating a severe breach of international humanitarian law and undermining peace and justice. The high civilian death toll directly contradicts the principles of protecting civilians during armed conflict, a core tenet of SDG 16. The lack of response and contestation from Israeli authorities further exacerbates the issue, hindering accountability and the pursuit of justice.