Gaza Faces Looming Famine: One in Three Lack Food Access

Gaza Faces Looming Famine: One in Three Lack Food Access

nrc.nl

Gaza Faces Looming Famine: One in Three Lack Food Access

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) warns of a looming famine in Gaza, where one in three residents lacks daily access to food; since April, 20,000 children have been treated for malnutrition, and at least 16 children under five have died of hunger since July 17, according to hospitals and the UN.

Dutch
Netherlands
Human Rights ViolationsHealthIsraelHumanitarian CrisisGazaPalestineChildrenFood InsecurityStarvationHunger
Save The ChildrenIntegrated Food Security Phase Classification (Ipc)Un
Annegré De Roos
What is the immediate impact of the food crisis in Gaza, and how many people are affected?
In Gaza, a severe food crisis is unfolding, with one in three residents lacking access to food for multiple consecutive days. Since April, 20,000 children have received treatment for malnutrition, and at least sixteen children under five have died from hunger since July 17th, according to the UN and hospitals. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) reports that food access has plummeted to unprecedented lows.
What factors beyond the conflict are contributing to the severity of the food crisis in Gaza?
The crisis is exacerbated by the ongoing Israeli attacks, hindering aid delivery. While 10,000 children were screened for malnutrition in January, only 600 were screened in April due to limited access. The situation meets the first criterion for famine according to IPC: at least 20 percent of households experience extreme food insecurity. Acute malnutrition among children in Gaza City has surpassed 15 percent.
What are the potential long-term health and developmental consequences of this crisis, and what obstacles impede effective aid delivery?
The lack of access for aid workers, coupled with the collapse of the local healthcare system and displacement of civilians, makes accurate data collection extremely difficult. The inability to deliver essential supplies, including specialized therapeutic food for severely malnourished children, will have long-term consequences for child health and development. The delay in providing aid, even before formal declaration of famine, is considered unconscionable by several UN agencies.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the situation as a severe humanitarian crisis, using strong emotional language like "hongersnood" (famine) and "schrikbarende getallen" (shocking numbers) from the beginning. The use of quotes from Save the Children, emphasizing the dire situation and highlighting the lack of access for aid workers, further reinforces this frame. While the numbers presented are impactful, the lack of counterbalancing perspectives or acknowledgement of other factors might lead readers to an overly pessimistic view of the situation.

2/5

Language Bias

The article uses emotive language, such as "schrikbarende getallen" (shocking numbers) and descriptions of children dying from hunger, to emphasize the severity of the situation. While this is understandable given the context, it could be argued that more neutral language could be used. For example, instead of "schrikbarende getallen", the article could say "alarming statistics." The repeated use of phrases highlighting the severity of the situation might unintentionally skew the reader's perception.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza due to food shortages, but omits discussion of the political and military factors that have contributed to this situation. While the article mentions Israeli attacks and the blockade, it does not delve into the complexities of these issues or present counterarguments or alternative perspectives. This omission might prevent readers from gaining a complete understanding of the root causes of the crisis and forming a fully informed opinion.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article doesn't explicitly present a false dichotomy, but by focusing primarily on the humanitarian suffering and lack of aid, it implicitly creates a dichotomy between victims and helpers. The complex geopolitical context and the different actors involved are sidelined, thereby creating a simplified narrative of good versus evil.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article primarily features Annegré de Roos from Save the Children as the expert voice. While her expertise is relevant, the absence of other perspectives, particularly from Gaza residents or representatives from different organizations, might limit the diversity of voices and perspectives. There's no apparent gender bias in language use.

Sustainable Development Goals

Zero Hunger Very Negative
Direct Relevance

The article describes a famine-like situation in Gaza, where a third of the population lacks access to food for multiple days, thousands of children suffer from malnutrition, and dozens of children have died from hunger. This directly impacts SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) which aims to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. The situation in Gaza dramatically contradicts this goal.