ru.euronews.com
Gaza Reconstruction: Palestinians Return to Devastation
Following a ceasefire, Palestinians are returning to homes in Gaza, facing widespread destruction after 15 months of conflict; initial assessments reveal the need for extensive reconstruction costing an estimated €17.9 billion, with over 46,000 Palestinians reported dead.
- What is the extent of the damage in key areas of Gaza, and what are the immediate needs regarding healthcare infrastructure?
- The scale of destruction is immense, exemplified by Khan Yunis in southern Gaza, considered the most heavily damaged area. Similar scenes unfold in Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza, where most structures are leveled. The return to Rafah reveals widespread destruction and human remains among the rubble, with the healthcare system described as entirely destroyed.
- What are the immediate consequences of the Gaza ceasefire concerning the return of Palestinian civilians to their homes and the state of infrastructure?
- Following a Gaza ceasefire and street celebrations, Palestinians are returning to their destroyed homes. The first phase of the Israel-Hamas agreement sees Israeli troops withdrawing from densely populated areas, enabling thousands to return, if their homes remain. Fifteen months of intense fighting and airstrikes have left vast areas in ruins.
- What are the projected long-term costs and challenges associated with the reconstruction of Gaza, given the scale of destruction and the reported casualty figures?
- The recovery will take years. A joint EU, UN, and World Bank report estimated reconstruction costs at €17.9 billion for essential infrastructure. The Hamas-run health ministry reports over 46,000 Palestinian deaths. The needs are immense; medical facilities require rebuilding with at least three hospitals needed in Rafah, five in Gaza City, and three field hospitals in the north, according to hospital director Marwan al-Hamas.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing strongly emphasizes the devastation and suffering in Gaza. The descriptions of ruined homes, hospitals, and human remains are emotionally powerful and dominate the narrative. The headline (if there was one, it's not provided in the text) likely reinforced this focus. This emphasis, while understandable given the scale of the destruction, risks overshadowing other relevant aspects of the conflict.
Language Bias
While the language used is descriptive and conveys the severity of the situation, it generally avoids overtly charged language. The use of phrases such as "massive destruction" and "ruined homes" are factual, although emotionally impactful. However, the repeated focus on suffering and devastation could be seen as implicitly biased, even if not explicitly inflammatory.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the destruction and suffering in Gaza, providing detailed accounts of the devastation. However, it omits any perspective from the Israeli side, failing to address their justifications for the military actions or the potential challenges they faced. The lack of Israeli voices prevents a balanced understanding of the conflict's complexities. The article also omits details about the potential casualties suffered by the Israeli side and any rebuilding efforts they might be undertaking.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between Israeli actions and Palestinian suffering. While acknowledging the immense devastation, it doesn't explore the nuances of the conflict, the underlying political tensions, or the roles of other actors. The narrative subtly implies that Israeli actions are solely responsible for the destruction, without fully acknowledging the broader political context.
Sustainable Development Goals
The conflict has caused widespread destruction of homes and infrastructure in Gaza, leaving many Palestinians without shelter and basic necessities, pushing them further into poverty.