dw.com
Gelsenkirchen: Poverty, Populism, and the Fight for Revival
Gelsenkirchen, Germany's poorest city, grapples with 14% unemployment, €18,000 average yearly income, and the rise of the far-right AfD, despite community-led revitalization projects like the Nordsternpark and Kreativquartier Bochumer Strasse.
- What are the most significant economic and social challenges facing Gelsenkirchen, and what are their immediate consequences?
- Gelsenkirchen, Germany's poorest city, faces high unemployment (over 14%), low average income (€18,000), and widespread poverty, with one in four employed people relying on social welfare. Mayor Karin Welge attributes this to a drastic post-industrial decline, marked by the loss of half its social insurance contributing jobs since the 1970s.
- How did the decline of the coal mining industry and the influx of low-skilled EU migrants contribute to Gelsenkirchen's current situation?
- The city's economic struggles stem from its heavy reliance on coal mining, which collapsed after the closure of its last mine in 2008. Limited funding from the state government hinders investment in crucial areas like education, exacerbating existing problems. The influx of low-skilled EU migrants post-2007 has added to social challenges and fueled the rise of the far-right AfD.
- Can local initiatives like the Nordsternpark and Kreativquartier Bochumer Strasse overcome the deep-seated social and political divisions in Gelsenkirchen, and what are the long-term prospects for the city?
- Despite the challenges, initiatives like the Nordsternpark and the Kreativquartier Bochumer Strasse demonstrate community efforts to revitalize the city. However, the AfD's strong showing in recent elections (21.7% in 2024 European Parliament elections) reveals deep-seated social divisions and a lack of trust in established institutions. Future success hinges on overcoming this lack of trust and fostering a sense of collective action.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Gelsenkirchen's story primarily as one of decline and struggle. The headline (not provided, but inferable from the text) likely emphasizes the city's poverty and challenges. The introduction immediately highlights the city's status as the poorest in Germany and uses imagery of 'garbage in the streets' to set a negative tone. The inclusion of the mayor's quotes about the 'brutal structural collapse' and the AfD's gains further reinforce this negative framing. While positive developments are mentioned, they are presented as exceptions to the overall narrative of decline. The extensive discussion of the AfD's success and the loss of solidarity further contributes to a bleak and concerning tone.
Language Bias
The article uses strong negative language when describing Gelsenkirchen, such as "poorest city", "garbage lies about", "derelict apartments", and "brutal structural collapse." These phrases create a sense of hopelessness and decay. While some neutral language is used in the descriptions of the positive developments, the overall tone remains overwhelmingly negative. The choice of words repeatedly emphasizes the city's struggles, creating a biased impression.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of Gelsenkirchen's economic and social situation, but omits potential positive developments or initiatives beyond the Nordsternpark and Kreativquartier projects. While acknowledging some positive changes, the overall narrative emphasizes the city's struggles, potentially neglecting other successful revitalization efforts or positive community initiatives. The article also doesn't explore the specific reasons behind the AfD's gains in detail, limiting analysis to general explanations of immigration and lost solidarity. Further, it doesn't explore potential solutions offered by other political parties beyond the mentioned lack of funding from the state.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between the city's struggling past and a potential future where things may improve. While it highlights both the decline and some ongoing revitalization efforts, it doesn't fully explore the complexities of the city's current condition or the various approaches to tackling its challenges. The implicit suggestion that the only paths are continued decline or slow improvement through limited local projects oversimplifies the reality of potential solutions and policy choices.
Gender Bias
The article features several prominent female figures, including the mayor and a volunteer in the Kreativquartier, suggesting a balanced representation of women. However, it's important to note the lack of attention to gender dynamics in the city's struggles and the AfD's rise. There is no explicit gender bias in language, and the focus remains primarily on socio-economic factors rather than gendered ones.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Gelsenkirchen as Germany's poorest city, with high unemployment (14%), low average income (€18,000), and widespread poverty. Many rely on social welfare, indicating a significant failure to alleviate poverty and ensure decent living standards.