GEM Report: Women's Entrepreneurship Surges, but Funding Barriers Persist

GEM Report: Women's Entrepreneurship Surges, but Funding Barriers Persist

forbes.com

GEM Report: Women's Entrepreneurship Surges, but Funding Barriers Persist

The 2023/2024 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Women's Entrepreneurship Report finds women now comprise one-third of high-growth entrepreneurs globally, with startup rates increasing significantly in several countries; however, access to capital and sector-specific biases remain key obstacles.

English
United States
EconomyGender IssuesEconomic DevelopmentGender EqualityStartup FundingFemale FoundersWomens EntrepreneurshipGlobal Entrepreneurship
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (Gem)Cartier Women's InitiativeThe School Of Management FriborgThe Frank And Eileen Center For Women's Entrepreneurial LeadershipZenonco.ioLab4URoseo Eólica UrbanaCuimer
Ariana MartínKomali DadlaniDimple ParmarAya LarakiAileen Ionescu-Somers
How do the sectors in which women tend to start businesses impact their access to funding and growth potential?
The GEM report highlights a disparity in entrepreneurial sector choices between men and women. Women are over-represented in wholesale/retail and government/social services, while under-represented in technology and agriculture. This sector bias impacts access to funding, as investment tends to favor STEM and ICT fields. Consequently, policies promoting women's involvement in these growth sectors are recommended.
What is the most significant finding of the GEM 2023/2024 Women's Entrepreneurship Report regarding women's participation in high-growth ventures?
A 2023/2024 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) report reveals that women now constitute one-third of high-growth entrepreneurs globally, a significant increase from previous years. This surge is particularly notable in countries like France, the Netherlands, and Hungary, where women more than doubled their startup rates. However, access to capital and funding remains a significant barrier.
What policy recommendations does the report offer to encourage greater participation of women in high-growth entrepreneurial sectors and overcome existing barriers?
Future growth in women's entrepreneurship hinges on addressing systemic barriers to funding and sector diversification. Policies supporting access to capital, mentorship, and networking opportunities are crucial. Additionally, promoting successful women entrepreneurs in STEM and ICT fields can inspire more women to pursue education and careers in these high-growth areas, fostering a positive feedback loop.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the narrative positively, showcasing the successes and growth of women entrepreneurs. While this is important, the consistent emphasis on positive stories might overshadow the persistent challenges and inequalities. The headline and introduction focus on the increasing number of women entrepreneurs, creating a potentially misleading impression of rapid progress that overlooks ongoing barriers. The inclusion of specific examples of successful women entrepreneurs, while inspiring, reinforces a potentially biased focus on individual success rather than systemic change.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral and positive, celebrating the achievements of women entrepreneurs. However, phrases such as "surges" and "dramatic increase" might be considered slightly hyperbolic. Terms like "challenging the common perception" and "growing impact" could be considered promotional rather than purely objective. While the language is largely positive, it avoids overly negative or disparaging terms.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the successes of women entrepreneurs but gives limited detail on the challenges they face beyond access to capital and cultural norms. While it mentions the impact of Covid-19 and caregiving responsibilities, it doesn't delve deeply into other potential systemic barriers or personal struggles. The lack of diverse perspectives from women entrepreneurs across various socio-economic backgrounds and industries could limit the reader's understanding of the multifaceted challenges faced. The omission of negative experiences or failures could paint an overly optimistic picture.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the barriers faced by women entrepreneurs, primarily focusing on access to capital and cultural norms. It doesn't adequately explore the interplay of multiple factors, such as societal expectations, biases in education and training, or the impact of intersectionality (e.g., race, class, and location). The narrative implicitly suggests that increased access to funding and STEM education will solve most challenges, neglecting the complexity of the issue.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article focuses on women's entrepreneurial journeys and highlights their achievements, which is positive. However, it predominantly presents a Western-centric view, and could benefit from a broader representation of experiences from diverse cultural and economic backgrounds. There is some focus on the challenges faced by women, but it is limited and doesn't always explore the underlying gender biases involved. While it mentions differences in sector choices, it could delve deeper into the societal pressures and expectations that lead to such choices.

Sustainable Development Goals

Gender Equality Positive
Direct Relevance

The article highlights the increasing number of women entrepreneurs globally, challenging traditional gender roles in business and high-growth ventures. It showcases successful women entrepreneurs across various sectors and emphasizes the positive impact of policies and initiatives supporting women in entrepreneurship. The report directly addresses the gender gap in entrepreneurship and advocates for policies to bridge it.