genova.repubblica.it
Genoa Election Campaign Ignores Critical Civil Protection Risks
Genoa's election campaign conspicuously omits the crucial issue of Civil Protection, despite the city's high hydrogeological risk and history of devastating floods; this exposes citizens to potential danger, particularly given the lack of a comprehensive and accessible plan, last updated in 2014, and IREN's controversial relocation to a flood-prone building.
- What are the immediate implications of the complete absence of discussion about Genoa's Civil Protection system from both sides of the current election campaign?
- The lack of discussion regarding Genoa's Civil Protection system during the current election campaign is alarming, given the city's history of devastating floods and ongoing hydrogeological risks. The absence of a dedicated assessor in the first Bucci administration hampered progress, and the current administration's silence is equally concerning. This silence is particularly surprising from the left, who usually champion such issues.
- What are the broader systemic causes and consequences of the apparent disregard for the ongoing hydrogeological risks in Genoa, as exemplified by IREN's relocation?
- The city's vulnerability is highlighted by IREN's decision to relocate its headquarters to a building in Borgo Incrociati, an area prone to Bisagno river flooding. The building has flooded nine times since the river was covered, underscoring the continued risk. The lack of objection from the municipality and the region further emphasizes the apparent disregard for public safety.
- What are the potential future impacts of neglecting the city's Civil Protection planning, particularly in light of the city's history of flooding and the continued risks?
- The ongoing absence of a comprehensive and accessible Civil Protection plan, last updated during the Doria administration, leaves citizens unprepared for potential emergencies. This inaction creates a significant risk, especially in high-risk areas like Bisagno. The lack of political will to address this issue during the election campaign signifies a major governance failure and puts the population at risk.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the absence of civil protection discussion as a major failure, primarily blaming both the right-wing parties for their historical neglect and the left-wing parties for their current silence. The headline (if one existed) would likely emphasize this absence. The selection and sequencing of examples, like the IREN building relocation, reinforce the narrative of risk mismanagement. This framing could potentially lead readers to overemphasize the issue's significance, or the blame placed on specific political parties, while potentially overlooking other societal factors.
Language Bias
The language used is strong and accusatory, particularly when referring to the political parties involved. Phrases like "dispetti" (mischief), "quasi scomparso" (almost disappeared), and "azzardata iniziativa" (risky initiative) carry strong negative connotations. More neutral alternatives could include 'disagreements,' 'underemphasized,' and 'controversial decision,' respectively. The repeated use of negative terms contributes to a biased tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the lack of discussion regarding civil protection, particularly from the left-wing parties. This omission of the left's potential plans or viewpoints on civil protection creates an incomplete picture. While the author mentions the right's history of neglecting this issue, the absence of any left-wing proposals or stances leaves a significant gap in the analysis, potentially leading readers to assume a lack of concern from that political spectrum.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that only the right-wing parties neglect civil protection. The author criticizes the left for their silence on the issue, suggesting that their silence equates to agreement with the right's approach. This ignores the possibility of other factors contributing to the lack of discussion, or the potential for alternative approaches not yet articulated.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the lack of attention to civil protection in the city, specifically concerning the outdated and unknown civil protection plan. This directly impacts the safety and resilience of the city and its citizens, hindering progress towards sustainable and resilient urban development. The example of IREN moving its headquarters to a flood-prone area further exemplifies the negligence towards urban risk management.