genova.repubblica.it
Genoa Exhibition Showcases Gaza Crisis Through Art and Testimony
The "Be my Voice" exhibition in Genoa (April 1st) showcases Palestinian journalist AlHassan Selmi's Gaza reportage and Marcella Brancaforte's illustrations, aiming to counter media silence and support Selmi's family.
- What is the central aim of the "Be my Voice" exhibition, and what specific actions will it take to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza?
- An exhibition titled "Be my Voice" opens in Genoa on April 1st, showcasing the work of Palestinian journalist AlHassan Selmi and illustrator Marcella Brancaforte. It highlights the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where Selmi has documented the genocide for 17 months. The event includes a live interview with Selmi from Gaza.
- What are the long-term implications of this initiative for raising awareness about the Gaza conflict and influencing global perspectives on the humanitarian crisis?
- The event aims to raise awareness of the prolonged humanitarian crisis in Gaza, challenging the relative silence in mainstream media. By directly connecting with Selmi through a live interview, the exhibition provides a powerful platform for amplifying the voices and experiences of those enduring the ongoing conflict and promoting discussion of lasting solutions.
- How does the collaboration between AlHassan Selmi and Marcella Brancaforte contribute to the exhibition's impact, and what are the intended outcomes of this partnership?
- The exhibition uses Selmi's words and Brancaforte's illustrations to depict the daily realities of the Gaza siege. The collaboration aims to break through the silence surrounding the conflict, offering a firsthand account of the suffering endured by the population. Half the proceeds from the sale of a related book will support Selmi and his family.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the suffering and injustice in Gaza intensely, using emotionally charged language such as "genocide" and "atrociously prolonged". The headline and opening lines immediately establish this tone, potentially influencing reader perception and precluding balanced consideration.
Language Bias
The text uses strongly emotive and judgmental language, such as "genocide," "horror," "atrociously prolonged," and "devastation." These terms are not objective descriptions and strongly influence the reader's interpretation towards a narrative of intense suffering. More neutral terms like "conflict," "humanitarian crisis," and "extensive destruction" might be considered.
Bias by Omission
The text focuses heavily on the suffering in Gaza, but omits counter perspectives or potential mitigating factors. While acknowledging the humanitarian crisis, it doesn't present alternative viewpoints on the conflict or the role of different actors involved. This omission could create a biased narrative.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a stark dichotomy between the suffering in Gaza and the perceived silence of mainstream media. It doesn't explore the complexities of media coverage or potential reasons why certain aspects might be under-reported, creating a false choice between complete silence and unmitigated catastrophe.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where the population faces extreme hardship and lack of access to basic necessities, indicating a severe impact on poverty levels. The ongoing siege and violence exacerbate existing poverty and inequality.