dw.com
German BKA: 575 Individuals Classified as Dangerous, Primarily Due to Islamist Ideology
The German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) reported on April 19th, 2025, that 575 individuals are considered dangerous, primarily due to Islamist ideology; this number is slightly lower than the 608 at the start of 2023, but over 450 Islamists are wanted, many for terrorism-related crimes.
- What is the current assessment of the threat posed by Islamist extremism in Germany, and what specific actions are being taken to address this?
- The German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) identifies 575 individuals as dangerous, primarily due to Islamist ideology. This represents a slight decrease from 608 at the start of 2023, with 458 classified as religious ideologues (mostly Islamists) as of April 1st, 2025. The BKA anticipates these individuals may commit significant politically motivated crimes.
- How has the number of individuals classified as 'dangerous elements' by the BKA changed over time, and what factors might contribute to these fluctuations?
- The BKA's assessment highlights a persistent threat from Islamist extremism in Germany. While the overall number of 'dangerous elements' decreased slightly, the significant number of Islamists in this category (458 as of April 1st) indicates a continuing concern. Furthermore, over 450 individuals with Islamist ties are wanted, with many facing terrorism-related charges.
- What are the long-term implications of the rise in Islamist propaganda and the increased number of wanted individuals with Islamist ties for Germany's national security?
- The recent increase in Islamist propaganda, fueled by the Middle East conflict, poses a growing threat. This propaganda directly incites violence, compounding the existing risk posed by the 575 individuals already identified as dangerous. The BKA's ongoing efforts to monitor and apprehend those involved are crucial in mitigating future risks.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introductory paragraph emphasize Islamist extremism as the primary security concern in Germany. The article prioritizes information about Islamist extremists, devoting significantly more space and detail to this group than to other extremist groups. This framing could influence readers to perceive Islamist extremism as a more severe and immediate threat than other forms of extremism.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language such as "main threat" and "dangerous elements" when discussing Islamist extremism. While factually reporting statistics from official sources, the choice of words could be considered emotionally charged and might reinforce negative perceptions of this specific group compared to others mentioned. More neutral terms could include "individuals identified as potential threats" or "persons of interest".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Islamist extremism as the primary security threat, potentially omitting or downplaying the significance of other threats. While right- and left-wing extremism are mentioned, the details provided are significantly less extensive than the information on Islamist extremism. The article also lacks context on the overall crime rates in Germany and how these extremist groups compare to other criminal activities. The article's focus may mislead readers into believing Islamist extremism is the most prevalent and dangerous threat, neglecting a more nuanced understanding of the security landscape.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by primarily focusing on Islamist extremism as the main security threat, implicitly contrasting it with other forms of extremism without providing a balanced comparison of their relative impact and prevalence. This framing might lead readers to overestimate the danger of Islamist extremism compared to other threats.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a rise in individuals categorized as dangerous elements, primarily Islamist extremists, posing a threat to national security and social stability. This directly impacts the ability of Germany to maintain peace, justice, and strong institutions, hindering progress towards SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). The increase in politically motivated crimes and the number of individuals under investigation undermines the rule of law and public safety.