welt.de
German Farmers Face Increased Crop Risks Due to Climate Change
German farmers are facing increased crop risks due to climate change, with many experiencing insufficient government subsidies for multi-peril crop insurance, despite 70% of farmland being used for arable farming.
- How does climate change exacerbate the risks faced by German farmers, and what are the long-term implications?
- Climate change leads to more frequent and intense extreme weather events, damaging crops. Warmer winters cause plants to sprout earlier, making them vulnerable to late frosts that can destroy entire harvests before fruit develops. Furthermore, despite recent rains, prolonged periods of drought, particularly in central and eastern Germany since 2018, have depleted soil water reserves, creating a long-term water deficit.
- What measures are being considered to address the long-term challenges of water scarcity in German agriculture?
- Authorities are exploring water usage restrictions as a last resort, and the Federal Environment Agency (UBA) is developing guidelines for managing water scarcity. Currently, some farmers already face limitations on water rights and extraction, necessitating long-term planning and drought scenarios for future agricultural practices.
- What is the primary impact of insufficient government subsidies for multi-peril crop insurance on German farmers?
- Insufficient subsidies leave German farmers vulnerable to extreme weather events like frost, heavy rain, drought, and storms, threatening their livelihoods and food security. The German Farmers' Association is urging the federal government to cover at least 50% of insurance premiums for these risks, aligning with the global average of 70% coverage in other EU countries like France, Italy, Spain, and Poland.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of the challenges faced by German farmers due to climate change and the need for improved risk management. While it highlights the farmers' concerns and the call for increased government subsidies, it also includes expert opinions and data from various sources, such as the Bauernverband, Allianz, and the Forschungszentrum Jülich. The inclusion of diverse perspectives prevents a one-sided narrative.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective. There is no significant use of loaded terms or emotionally charged language. Technical terms are explained clearly, making the article accessible to a wider audience.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including information about the specific measures already in place in other EU countries to support farmers in dealing with climate change-related risks. This would add more context to the comparison between Germany's approach and those of other nations. Additionally, exploring the potential economic impact of insufficient support for farmers would strengthen the analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the impact of climate change on agriculture, highlighting the need for effective risk management strategies to ensure food security. Government support for multi-peril crop insurance is crucial to mitigate the effects of extreme weather events on crop yields and maintain a stable food supply. The mention of supporting acreage crops alongside specialty crops emphasizes the importance of ensuring food production across the board.