faz.net
German Firms Team Up to Sue Online Betting Providers
Two German companies join forces to sue online betting providers for pre-2020 losses, with a case before the European Court of Justice.
German
Germany
TechnologyGermany EuropeLawsuitLegalGambling
Rightmart GroupGamesrightTipicoBundesgerichtshof (Bgh)European Court Of Justice (Ecj)
Hannes Beuck
- What is the expected impact of the European Court of Justice's decision?
- The ECJ's decision is expected in 2025 and will significantly impact the outcome of thousands of similar lawsuits. Until then, legal tech providers and betting companies are engaged in a protracted legal battle.
- What is the significance of Gamesright's involvement in the case against Tipico?
- Gamesright has already claimed over 50 million euros in losses on behalf of betting customers against providers. A case involving Gamesright and Tipico has been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for a ruling on the legality of pre-2020 online sports bets.
- What is the ambiguity regarding the legality of online sports betting before 2020?
- While Gamesright and others aggressively claim all online sports bets before 2020 were illegal, the legality of such bets before that date is not always determined in their favor. The ECJ's decision will clarify this ambiguous legal situation.
- What is the main purpose of the collaboration between Rightmart Group and Gamesright?
- Rightmart Group, a large German consumer law firm, and Gamesright, a legal tech company, are collaborating to sue online betting providers for losses incurred by customers before 2020.
- What is the strategy employed by Gamesright and similar companies in their communication about online sports betting?
- The collaboration aims to increase market share for both Rightmart Group and Gamesright by pursuing claims for losses from online sports betting before the legalization of online sports betting in 2020. The aggressiveness of their claims and marketing has created tension within the industry.