German Housing Crisis Deepens Amid Record Low Orders

German Housing Crisis Deepens Amid Record Low Orders

welt.de

German Housing Crisis Deepens Amid Record Low Orders

Germany's housing construction crisis continues, with 57% of firms reporting a lack of orders in January 2025, driven by high construction costs despite strong demand; projections show a further drop in new housing completions to under 200,000 by 2026.

German
Germany
EconomyLabour MarketHousing ShortageConstruction IndustryIfo InstituteGerman Housing CrisisBerlin Housing Market
Ifo-InstitutHauptverband Der Deutschen BauindustrieEuropäische Zentralbank
Klaus WohlrabeTim-Oliver Müller
What are the key factors driving the ongoing crisis in German housing construction, and what are its immediate consequences?
Germany's housing construction crisis, ongoing for almost three years, shows no signs of ending. A record-high 57% of housing companies reported a lack of orders in the Ifo Institute's monthly economic survey, and expectations remain pessimistic. This crisis, marked by a -43.2 Ifo indicator in January, reflects high construction costs, not a lack of housing demand.",
How does the current situation in Berlin reflect broader trends in Germany's housing market, and what are the underlying causes of the supply-demand mismatch?
High construction costs are the primary cause of the crisis, not insufficient demand. The mismatch between high demand, especially in major cities like Berlin (75,000 new residents vs. 15,000 new apartments in 2022), and low supply creates social tension. Despite the completion of almost 300,000 new apartments in 2023, forecasts predict a drop to under 200,000 by 2026.",
What are the potential long-term implications of this crisis for German society, and what policy interventions could effectively address the underlying challenges?
The German housing market faces a severe supply-demand imbalance, exacerbated by high construction costs. The failure to meet the Berlin coalition's target of 400,000 new apartments annually, combined with pessimistic forecasts, points to a deepening crisis with significant social consequences. Addressing high costs and streamlining building permits are crucial for any solution.",

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The article's framing is overwhelmingly negative. The headline (if there were one, based on the provided text) would likely emphasize the crisis and lack of progress. The repeated use of phrases like "crisis," "pessimistic," and "depression" sets a tone that reinforces a sense of hopelessness. The inclusion of statistics on declining housing starts further exacerbates this negative framing.

3/5

Language Bias

The language used is quite negative, employing words like "crisis," "depression," "Talfahrt" (downward trend), and "social explosive." These terms carry strong connotations and contribute to the overall pessimistic tone. More neutral alternatives could include "challenges," "difficulties," "decrease" or "decline" instead of "Talfahrt" and "significant societal concerns" instead of "social explosive.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of the housing crisis, quoting industry leaders expressing pessimism. While it mentions high demand in major cities like Berlin, it omits discussion of potential solutions or government initiatives beyond criticizing the failed Berlin coalition's housing goals. The lack of diverse perspectives, such as those from government officials or individuals experiencing housing insecurity, limits the article's comprehensiveness.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by focusing primarily on the lack of supply and high costs, implying these are the sole reasons for the housing crisis. It doesn't fully explore other contributing factors like zoning regulations, land availability, or financing issues that might also play a significant role.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article doesn't exhibit overt gender bias. The quoted individuals are predominantly male, but this may reflect the gender distribution within the German construction industry rather than conscious bias.

Sustainable Development Goals

Sustainable Cities and Communities Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a significant crisis in German housing construction, with a dramatic shortfall in new housing units compared to demand. This directly impacts the UN Sustainable Development Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), specifically target 11.1, which aims to make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable. The shortage of affordable housing, particularly in major cities like Berlin, exacerbates inequalities and threatens social cohesion, hindering progress towards SDG 11.